Taliban Criticises UN, Accuses UNAMA Of Being Unsuccessful In Afghanistan

This council, a concept in Sunni Islamic governance, refers to a body of qualified individuals empowered to appoint or depose a ruler (such as a caliph) on behalf of the Muslim community.

Sayyaf argued that the Taliban lacks legitimacy and insisted that representatives of the people must be involved in selecting a leader. Speaking to Iran’s IRAF News Agency, he stated that the council should be composed of representatives from districts and provinces to elect Afghanistan’s leader.

He emphasised that if a leader were chosen through this process, the people would pledge allegiance to them, but he criticised the Taliban for not adopting this approach.

Criticism of the Taliban’s Legitimacy

Sayyaf pointed to the 1990s government of former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, which, he said, was formed through a similar council with a religious foundation. He added that the Mujahideen defended Rabbani’s government against the Taliban on this principle, as it had been selected through a legitimate Islamic process.

He asserted that if the Taliban followed the same method, he and his allies would accept its decision—even if they were not part of the council. However, he accused the Taliban of ruling without public support, claiming that their interpretation of Sharia law is flawed and not truly Islamic.

Sayyaf further questioned the Taliban’s legitimacy, stressing that the establishment of an Islamic system requires clear principles and proper mechanisms. He stated “Implementing Sharia is a skill and an expertise.”

Sayyaf’s Political Background and Call for Peace

Despite advocating for the Shurā-ye Ḥall wa ‘Aqd, Sayyaf has been deeply involved in Afghanistan’s electoral system over the past two decades. He was twice elected as a member of parliament from Kabul and ran in the 2014 presidential elections, though he did not win.

Reaffirming his commitment to peace, Sayyaf stated that he has always urged the Taliban that “war is not the solution.” However, he claimed that the Taliban has never been willing to negotiate and suggested that even groups engaged in armed resistance are not opposed to peace. He also noted that anti-Taliban factions abroad have achieved greater unity and coordination.

Warm Reception in Iran

Sayyaf expressed gratitude for Iran’s hospitality and explained why he had not visited the country in the past 50 years. He revealed that, after receiving medical treatment in India, he travelled to Iran and had been living in Turkiye for the past three and a half years.

Who Is to Blame for the Fall of the Republic?

Addressing the collapse of Ashraf Ghani’s government, Sayyaf blamed it on the exclusion of key defenders of the nation, arguing that only the Mujahideen could have defended Afghanistan.

He claimed that Mujahideen commanders were sidelined in recent years, forced into menial jobs rather than being allowed to contribute to national security.

Sayyaf further revealed that he had personally requested Ashraf Ghani to entrust him with Kabul’s security, but Ghani refused due to political differences with the Mujahideen.

“The Dark Night Will End”

Concluding his interview, Sayyaf delivered a message to the Afghan people: “The dark night will end, and morning lies ahead.”

During his visit to Iran, Sayyaf also met with Iranian officials. In recent months, Iran has intensified its engagement with Afghan political figures and opposition groups against the Taliban. Recently, several IRGC commanders met with leaders of the National Resistance Council for the Salvation of Afghanistan in Ankara.

During a visit to a migrant camp in Mashhad, Mozaffari highlighted concerns over Afghan migrants who enter Iran with valid permits but remain in the country after their visas expire.

He stressed that even legal migration requires careful regulation, stating that Afghans entering Iran should have a clear purpose. “If they are coming for work, they must obtain a work visa. If they are visiting as tourists, they should arrive as part of an organised tour or group,” he added.

Speaking to Iranian media, Mozaffari expressed hope that Afghanistan’s social and economic conditions would improve, reducing the need for migration.

He also emphasised Iran’s interest in fostering economic opportunities at the Afghan border to encourage joint investments. “Our goal is to create employment opportunities in border areas so that Afghan workers entering Iran can reside there instead of migrating further into the country,” he stated.

In a statement issued on Monday, 3 March, the Taliban’s Supreme Court confirmed that the convicted individual received 39 lashes and was sentenced to six months in prison.

The Taliban has continued to enforce public corporal punishment, with reports emerging almost daily of individuals being flogged across various provinces. The group has officially acknowledged these punishments through public statements, reaffirming its commitment to their continuation.

Meanwhile, human rights organisations have condemned the practice, urging the Taliban to cease such punishments. They argue that, under international law, public floggings constitute torture and violate human dignity.

According to Iranian media, Davood Moazami Goudarzi, Tehran’s Cyber Police Chief, stated that the blogger had recently shared content deemed offensive to Iranian women. Following an investigation, authorities discovered that she had been working in a beauty salon in Tehran without proper documentation.

Goudarzi accused the blogger of “engaging in criminal activity in cyberspace without regard for the country’s laws.” He added that after being summoned, she apologised to Iranian women and claimed her posts were the result of a personal dispute with certain clients.

The Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA) reported that all of her social media accounts had been blocked and that her case had been referred to judicial authorities for further legal proceedings.

Goudarzi stated that the blogger’s Instagram posts had caused distress among Iranian women and that Tehran’s law enforcement prioritised the matter.

It remains unclear whether she has been released following interrogation, and authorities have not disclosed further details about the content that led to her arrest.

Sources in Pakistan also reported that one civilian was killed, and three Pakistani soldiers were wounded during the confrontation.

Local media, quoting Qani, stated that Pakistani forces initiated the clash, prompting the Taliban to retaliate. According to him, the fighting lasted until 11 a.m. on Monday. He further claimed that Pakistani forces suffered casualties and that some of their military posts were destroyed.

Pakistani sources told Afghanistan International that at least three Pakistani soldiers were injured, and one civilian was killed in the exchange of fire. A Pakistani security official, speaking anonymously to Türkiye’s Anadolu News Agency, stated that the injured individual had been shot, while another civilian died amid the chaos at the border.

Torkham, one of the two main trade crossings between Afghanistan and Pakistan, has remained closed for over a week due to a dispute over the Taliban’s construction of a new checkpoint.

A Pakistani official revealed that the border closure, which affects trade between Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in northwestern Pakistan and Nangarhar province in eastern Afghanistan, is causing an estimated daily loss of $3 million.

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Shafqat Ali Khan, previously stated that the closure was due to the Taliban’s attempt to build a checkpoint on Pakistani territory. Calling the move a violation of existing protocols, Khan emphasised that Pakistan aims to resolve the issue through dialogue.

Pakistani media have reported that multiple rounds of negotiations between Taliban and Pakistani border forces have been held in an effort to reopen the crossing, but no agreement has yet been reached.