Anti-Taliban Forces Carried Out 91 Attacks In Three Months, Reports UN

However, he accused Pakistan’s federal government of failing to cooperate with the provincial administration on the matter.

Speaking at a press conference at the Peshawar High Court, the senior Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government official revealed that the provincial administration had submitted Terms of Reference (TORs) for talks with Afghanistan to the federal government but had received no response despite multiple reminders.

“We have sent the TORs for talks with Afghanistan to the federal government, but despite repeated reminders, no response has been received. Terrorism is not just an issue for our province but for the entire country,” the official stated, as quoted by The News International.

Call for Dialogue Amid Rising Terrorism

Gandapur stressed that dialogue with the Afghan Taliban is the only viable solution to counter terrorism in Pakistan. He urged the federal government to take the security crisis seriously and respond to the proposals submitted by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government. He warned that if terrorism in the province is not effectively addressed, it could soon spread across the country.

Over the past year, both Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan have witnessed a surge in terrorist attacks. In response, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa administration has repeatedly called for negotiations with the Afghan Taliban.

Political Divide Over Engagement with the Taliban

Currently, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is governed by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), led by former Prime Minister Imran Khan, while the federal government is controlled by opposition parties. The PTI-led provincial government has historically favoured engagement with both the Afghan Taliban and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). However, Pakistan’s federal government and military firmly oppose granting any concessions to the Taliban, particularly the TTP.

The primary obstacle in past negotiations between the Pakistani government and the TTP has been the militants’ demands. While the government insists on the surrender of the TTP, the group demands control over parts of the tribal areas and the implementation of Sharia law. Previous negotiations, facilitated by the Afghan Taliban, were held in Kabul in 2022 but ultimately failed due to these irreconcilable differences.

According to the report, released early Thursday, tens of thousands of Afghan citizens could be affected by the proposed ban. The sources, who requested anonymity, said the decision stems from government assessments of security risks and deficiencies in the screening processes for travellers from these countries.

The sources indicated that Afghanistan is expected to be placed on the list of countries facing a full travel ban, while Pakistan is also under consideration. Other countries may also be included, though details remain unclear.

If implemented, the order would resemble Trump’s first-term travel ban, which targeted several Muslim-majority nations. That policy, initially introduced in 2017, was revised multiple times before being upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018. Trump’s successor, Joe Biden, reversed the ban in 2021.

Impact on Afghan SIV Holders and Refugees

The new restrictions could significantly impact Afghan citizens who had been approved for resettlement in the U.S. under refugee and Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) programmes but have not yet entered the country. Many of these individuals remain at risk of Taliban retaliation due to their cooperation with the U.S. during its 20-year military presence in Afghanistan.

One Reuters source said that these individuals are undergoing extensive security screening to ensure they are fully vetted. The U.S. State Department office responsible for overseeing Afghan resettlements is reportedly working to exempt SIV holders from the ban, though a source cautioned that such an exemption is “unlikely to be granted.”

Trump’s Executive Order and Its Broader Implications

Trump issued an executive order on 20 January calling for heightened security vetting for all foreign nationals seeking to enter the U.S. The order mandates that several government agencies— including the State Department, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence— submit a list of countries facing potential travel restrictions by 12 March.

The departments involved have not yet responded to requests for comment.

The travel ban is part of a broader immigration strategy that Trump has pursued since returning to office. In an October 2023 speech, he pledged to restrict entry from Gaza, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and “anywhere else that threatens our security.”

Concerns Over Afghan Evacuations

Shawn VanDiver, president of a coalition involved in Afghan evacuations and resettlements in coordination with the U.S. government, has urged visa holders to travel to the U.S. as soon as possible.

AfghanEvac, an organisation advocating for Afghan refugees and military partners of the U.S., warned that the Trump administration is likely to reinstate a travel ban affecting Afghan nationals. On Wednesday, the organisation posted on X:

“If you have a valid U.S. visa in your passport/travel document, travel as soon as possible. We are hearing from within State that a travel ban is likely coming in the next week for Afghan nationals (and others).”

AfghanEvac stated that while details on the potential travel ban remain uncertain, the organisation will oppose any such directive if confirmed.

During his first term, Trump’s travel ban did not initially include Afghanistan, but in 2017, The New York Times reported that the U.S. Embassy in Kabul had refused to issue visas to Afghans who had worked with the U.S. government, instructing them to withdraw their applications.

AfghanEvac, founded in August 2021 during the U.S. military’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, works to resettle at-risk Afghans, particularly former U.S. military partners. The organisation, comprising a coalition of 250 groups, has helped relocate over 195,000 eligible Afghans to the U.S. since 2021.

If enacted, the proposed travel ban would represent a significant setback for Afghan evacuees still awaiting resettlement, further complicating efforts to protect those who assisted U.S. forces during the war in Afghanistan.

In a statement released on Wednesday, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) confirmed that the TTP militants launched the attack on Tuesday using two explosive-laden vehicles. The assault resulted in 34 fatalities, including five Pakistani soldiers, 13 civilians, and 16 TTP militants, four of whom were suicide bombers. At least 32 others sustained injuries.

The powerful explosions partially destroyed the cantonment’s perimeter wall and several nearby houses. Videos circulating on social media captured the moment of the blasts, showing thick plumes of smoke rising into the sky amid sustained gunfire.

The Pakistani military has called on the Taliban government to prevent its territory from being used for terrorist activities against Pakistan. It warned that Islamabad reserves the right to take necessary measures in response to cross-border threats.

This incident marks the latest in a series of attacks where Pakistan has accused Afghan nationals of involvement in the ongoing conflict between the Pakistani military and the TTP. Islamabad has repeatedly claimed that the Taliban government provides sanctuary to TTP militants, an allegation Kabul denies, asserting that Pakistan’s security challenges are rooted within its own borders.

The Bannu attack comes amid ongoing clashes between Pakistani border forces and the Taliban at the Torkham border, which have been escalating over the past several days.

Expressing gratitude to Donald Trump, Sharif emphasised Islamabad’s continued cooperation with Washington in combating terrorism and maintaining regional security.

On Wednesday, 5 March, in his first address at a joint session of the U.S. Congress, former President Donald Trump announced that, in collaboration with Pakistan, the mastermind of the deadly Kabul Airport attack had been captured. The incident, which claimed the lives of 13 American soldiers and over 170 Afghan citizens, has now led to the suspect’s extradition to the United States for trial.

In a note posted on X, Sharif stated: “We thank US President Donald Trump for acknowledging and appreciating Pakistan’s role and support in counter-terrorism efforts across the region, in the context of Pakistan Security Forces’ recent apprehension of ISKP’s top-tier operational commander Shareefullah, an Afghan national.”

Sharif also reaffirmed Pakistan’s unwavering commitment to eradicating the threat of terrorism, adding, “We will continue to partner closely with the United States in securing regional peace and stability.”

The Associated Press, citing the White House, has identified the senior ISIS-K member as Mohammad Sharifullah. Similarly, Axios, quoting U.S. sources, reported that the individual, also known as “Jafar”, was responsible for planning and coordinating the attack at Abbey Gate – the entrance to Kabul Airport. Axios further noted that Sharifullah is expected to arrive in the United States on Wednesday, where his court hearing will be held publicly.

The organisation’s representative in Afghanistan emphasised that the UN stands in solidarity with Afghan women, continually supporting their rights and inclusion.

In a video message, Stephanie Loose, UN-Habitat’s representative, stated: “We stand in solidarity with Afghan women and girls, reaffirming our commitment to their rights, inclusion, and empowerment.”

Loose highlighted the UN’s efforts to improve living conditions across both urban and rural areas in Afghanistan. She pointed to several programmes implemented by UN-Habitat, noting that a better home, a safer neighbourhood, and improved access to essential services—such as water, education, and health—have a profound impact on the lives of Afghan women and girls.

This commitment comes amid growing concerns over the deteriorating situation for women and girls in Afghanistan, who continue to face systemic discrimination that has worsened over time. Earlier, a group of Afghan women protesters in Pakistan criticised the ongoing conditions and demanded that the voices of women and girls be heard.