Local sources in Takhar told Afghanistan International on Friday that the Taliban had promised to return weapons and military equipment seized from Ghulam Hussain, an influential Taliban Tajik commander.
The move comes amid growing tensions over gold mining in Chah Ab district of Takhar province.
In late 2024, the Taliban detained Ghulam Hussain in Chah Ab district.
At the time, Taliban intelligence seized more than 400 light and heavy weapons, several vehicles and a large quantity of ammunition belonging to him.
Ghulam Hussain also spent some time in Taliban custody and, after his release, had been barred from returning to his birthplace in Chah Ab district.
Sources told Afghanistan International on Friday, 24 July, that Taliban restrictions on the commander had been eased over the past week. According to the sources, he had been permitted to return to Chah Ab.
In recent weeks, Chah Ab district has become one of the main centres of tension in northern Afghanistan. Local sources have reported sporadic clashes between Taliban forces and residents over gold mining.
Reports have also emerged of local protests and a deadly Taliban crackdown.
According to the sources, Ghulam Hussain had spent most of this period in Kabul and occasionally travelled to Taloqan, the capital of Takhar province.
They added that he was not permitted to travel elsewhere without the approval of Taliban intelligence.
The Taliban has not officially commented on the matter, and it remains unclear what prompted the group to change its position towards the commander.
Ghulam Hussain was previously a commander under Bashir Qanet, an influential Hezb-e Islami figure in Takhar who was detained under the former government on allegations of harassment, murder and extortion.
Qanet later escaped from prison and joined the Taliban.
Ghulam Hussain was regarded as one of the Taliban’s most influentialTajik commanders in Takhar.
Reports indicate that he profited from the Nooraba gold mine in Chah Ab district and commanded hundreds of armed men.
Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur on Afghanistan, has warned against renewed military conflict between the United States and Iran, highlighting the precarious situation of Afghan refugees in Iran.
In a post on X on Saturday, 25 July, Bennett wrote that Afghan refugees in Iran were among the most vulnerable groups and often continued to be overlooked. He also expressed regret over continuing executions in Iran, particularly those involving Afghan migrants.
Earlier, Bennett and a group of independent United Nations human rights experts issued a statement condemning the resumption of military hostilities between Washington and Tehran and the risk of the conflict spreading to other areas.
The UN experts warned that abandoning agreed commitments to end the war would undermine prospects for peace, harm the rights of war victims and destroy the mutual trust needed for a lasting end to the conflict.
They stressed that civilians must not bear the cost of the fighting and that all parties must comply with international human rights and humanitarian law, particularly the principles of distinction between military and civilian targets, proportionality in attacks and precautionary measures to protect civilians.
Concerns Over Damage to Civilian Infrastructure
The UN experts said military attacks and counter-attacks between the United States and Iran on the nights of 12 and 13 July had marked a new phase in the escalation of the crisis and raised fears that the conflict could spread further across the region.
They expressed concern over reports of damage to civilian infrastructure in Iran, including ports, energy networks, transport routes and public service facilities, warning that such attacks could disrupt access to food, medicine and essential services.
People Caught Between Foreign Attacks and Domestic Repression
The statement said that during war and domestic repression, vulnerable groups, including women, children, people with disabilities, minorities, refugees and those living in poverty, suffer disproportionately and are often left unheard.
The UN human rights experts also expressed concern over continuing executions, mass arrests, torture and reports of enforced disappearances in Iran, saying that people in the country were trapped between the consequences of foreign attacks and domestic repression.
They called on all parties to immediately de-escalate tensions, prioritise the protection of civilians and return to dialogue and negotiations to resolve their disputes.
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has again urged the Taliban to prevent Afghan soil from being used for attacks against Pakistan. He said that Islamabad wants good relations but expects armed groups to be denied sanctuary.
Speaking at the Balochistan National Workshop in Islamabad on Friday, Sharif said: “We share a 2,000-kilometre border with Afghanistan. We are neighbours and have to live together, but we continue to urge the Afghan interim government not to allow its soil to be used for terrorism against Pakistan.”
His remarks come as Islamabad has repeatedly accused the Taliban in recent months of sheltering members of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and other armed groups. The Taliban have rejected the allegations, saying they will not allow Afghan territory to be used against any country.
Referring to a renewed rise in militant attacks in Pakistan, Sharif said more than 90,000 Pakistani civilians, soldiers and security personnel had lost their lives in the fight against terrorism. He also accused India of supporting terrorist groups but provided no evidence for the claim.
Sharif said Pakistan had largely brought terrorism under control by 2017 and 2018, but that the country must now examine how the threat had re-emerged and expanded.
He also expressed sorrow over Thursday’s attack in Mastung, Balochistan, which killed court judge Abdul Hakeem Kakar and his security guard, saying Pakistan’s security forces and civilians had paid a heavy price to ensure the country’s security.
In another part of his remarks, the prime minister stressed the importance of Balochistan’s development, saying Pakistan could progress only if all of its provinces developed simultaneously.
He announced a 300 billion rupee project for the Karachi-Chaman highway, saying the route, known as the “bloody road” because of its high number of traffic deaths, was expected to be completed within the next two years. Sharif also announced 50 billion rupees in funding to convert about 27,000 agricultural wells in Balochistan to solar power.
Meanwhile, Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari, during a meeting with several Balochistan provincial ministers, called for faster implementation of development projects and stronger coordination between government and security institutions to improve the province’s security and economic situation.
Sources told Afghanistan International on Friday that fighting between Taliban forces and armed opponents is continuing in Zebak district of Badakhshan, where the Taliban reportedly failed to retake positions lost overnight.
According to the sources, the Taliban launched a large-scale assault last night to recapture positions in the Topkhana area of Zebak district, but the attack was repelled by opposition forces.
Anti-Taliban fighters had earlier attacked several Taliban posts in the Topkhana area and, according to the sources, seized several positions. The Taliban then launched a clearing operation.
The sources said dozens of anti-Taliban fighters are involved in the clashes. No group or movement has officially claimed responsibility for the attack.
Sources said three local Taliban commanders were killed in the fighting.
Faridullah Wahdat, commander of one of the Taliban’s border post units, was among those killed. Afghanistan International has also received an image of his body.
At the same time, sources said the anti-Taliban forces also suffered casualties, although no details are available about their losses.
The Taliban has not yet commented on casualties among its forces or on the continuing clashes in Zebak district.
The fighting in the Topkhana area began around midday on Thursday. Sources had earlier told Afghanistan International that anti-Taliban forces attacked several Taliban posts and that the group sent a large number of reinforcements to the area.
The Taliban deployed commandos by helicopter and sent additional forces overland to the site of the clashes. Sources said some wounded Taliban fighters were flown by helicopter to Faizabad city.
Sources said the Taliban shut down telecommunications towers in the area after opposition forces attacked its positions.
Unlike previous sporadic clashes, forces from both sides are now directly engaged on several fronts. Sources say anti-Taliban fighters are positioned in the highlands of Zebak district.
The fighting comes days after the newly formed Sepah-e Mihan Front attacked Yaftali Sufla district in Badakhshan.
On 17 July, fighters from the front briefly took control of the district administration building, police headquarters and Taliban intelligence office in Yaftal, and raised their flag over the district administration building.
The Pakistani military rejected Amnesty International’s report on an air strike on a treatment centre in Kabul that killed civilians, accusing the Taliban of using hospitals and medical facilities as blind spots for terrorist activity.
The Pakistani military on Thursday, 23 July, described Amnesty International’s report as baseless.
Amnesty International said on Wednesday that a Pakistani air strike on the Omid Treatment and Rehabilitation Centre in Kabul on 16 March 2026, which killed at least 269 civilians, should be investigated as a possible war crime.
The organisation said it had found no evidence supporting the Pakistani military’s claim that the centre was being used to store weapons, ammunition or for other military purposes.
Pakistan Rejects Amnesty’s Findings and Questions UNAMA’s Access
The Pakistani military questioned the credibility of investigations conducted by Amnesty International and the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA).
It said claims that a 2,000-bed facility containing more than 4,000 patients, attendants and staff had been struck were inconsistent with conditions on the ground.
The military told Afghanistan International that if an incident of such scale and with such a high casualty toll had taken place, hundreds of videos and images should have emerged from patients and residents using mobile phones or CCTV cameras.
It said the absence of even a single piece of footage or image from the site was the strongest evidence against Amnesty International’s account.
The military also argued that Amnesty International’s review of only 60 photographs and 11 interviews was statistically unreliable for a facility of that size.
It further said Amnesty International’s report relied on UNAMA findings, while claiming that UNAMA’s work had been severely restricted by Taliban-imposed limitations.
Pakistan Accuses Amnesty’s South Asia Office of Indian Influence
The Pakistani military described Isabelle Lassee’s role as acting deputy regional director for South Asia at Amnesty International as a deceptive manoeuvre and alleged that the office was effectively led by Smriti Singh, an Indian national.
Amnesty International has not responded to the allegation.
The Pakistani military alleged that Singh had previously worked with media linked to Indian intelligence and, because of what it described as ties to networks connected to India’s Defence Ministry, used Lassee’s name to publish a commissioned report against Pakistan.
Pakistan accused staff at Amnesty International’s South Asia office of favouring the Indian government’s narrative and said the organisation was whitewashing Taliban bias and crimes.
Isabelle Lassee, Amnesty International’s Acting Regional Director for South Asia, said in a statement that Pakistan’s attack on the treatment facility in Kabul constituted a serious violation of international humanitarian law and called on Pakistan to carry out a transparent, independent and impartial investigation and make the findings public.
She said: “The attack on the Omid Centre constitutes a serious violation of international humanitarian law – possibly amounting to a war crime”. She added that because the site had been known as a medical facility for more than a decade, the strike pointed to a serious failure in Pakistan’s military planning that resulted in significant civilian deaths.
Pakistan Foreign Ministry Responds
Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi said at a press briefing on Thursday, 23 July, that no responsible state can remain indifferent to the continued targeting of its civilians and security forces.
Andrabi said all Pakistani military operations carried out in self-defence had been based on necessity and used only as a last resort.
He said the strikes had been directed solely and exclusively at terrorists and their support bases inside Afghanistan.
The spokesman said Pakistan’s response had been proportionate to the level of threat and that the principles of distinction, precaution and proportionality had been carefully observed.
Andrabi urged Amnesty International and the international community to focus their scrutiny on what he described as the Taliban regime’s continued support for terrorist groups.
He said Islamabad wanted the international community to hold the Taliban accountable for failing to meet its obligations under relevant UN Security Council resolutions, the Doha Agreement and other commitments to prevent Afghan territory from being used as a base for terrorism.
He added that Pakistan reserved the right to take all necessary measures to protect its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the security and safety of its citizens.
Qayum Malang, commander of the Sepah-e Mihan Front, released his first audio message five days after the attack on Yaftal district in Badakhshan, saying he and his fighters were safe.
Malang said on Wednesday, 22 July: “I am in full health. Do not follow the enemy’s propaganda. We are all safe and well.”
He also stressed that the front “has its own plans and objectives” and that its members prefer freedom above everything else.
The newly formed Sepah-e Mihan Front recently launched a surprise attack and seized Yaftali Sufla district, near Faizabad, the capital of Badakhshan province, for several hours.
The attackers entered government buildings, seized some military equipment and raised their flag over several buildings.
The attack brought Qayum Malang into the spotlight. The young commander led the military operation that resulted in the temporary capture of Yaftal.
Following the incident, the Taliban said it had detained several Sepah-e Mihan fighters.
In his first audio message, Malang rejected the claim and said all members of the front were safe and in good health. He urged supporters not to pay attention to Taliban propaganda.
Yaftali Sufla is one of the important districts of Badakhshan province. Its brief capture by an anti-Taliban group has become one of the province’s most significant recent security developments and continues to prompt political reactions and analysis.
Following Sepah-e Mihan’s unprecedented attack on Yaftal, the Taliban assigned its army chief, Fasihuddin Fitrat, to contain the group.
Fitrat travelled from Kabul to Yaftal in Badakhshan and claimed the attackers’ operation had been thwarted and that they had failed to achieve their objectives.
The Taliban army chief said in Badakhshan that authorities had learned in advance of the armed attackers’ plan to target Yaftal district.
He said they had received information early in the morning that the “enemy” planned to create unrest in Yaftal.
Fitrat added that after receiving the information, he travelled from Kabul to Badakhshan and ordered Taliban forces to act. He claimed the Taliban had thwarted the plan and prevented the attackers from achieving their objectives.
Hayatullah Muhajir Farahi, the Taliban’s deputy minister of information and culture, wrote on X on Friday that domestic and foreign enemies should understand the sensitivity of the Taliban’s security forces to any threat against the area.
The Taliban official also said that those who, in his words, obstruct Afghanistan’s economic progress “do not deserve any mercy”.