EU Reaffirms Support for Afghans In Pursuit Of Justice

Dina Titus, a Democratic representative from Nevada, condemned the move, stating that Trump is turning his back on those who risked everything to stand with the U.S., calling it a disgrace.

In a post on X, Titus emphasised that the office coordinating Afghan resettlement efforts has protected thousands of Afghan allies from Taliban retaliation.

Meanwhile, Gregory Meeks, a Democratic congressman from New York, accused Trump of abandoning Washington’s Afghan allies, despite bipartisan support in Congress for their resettlement.

Earlier, Reuters reported that officials at the State Department’s office overseeing Afghan resettlement have been instructed to prepare for its closure by April 2025.

According to Reuters, if the closure proceeds, approximately 200,000 eligible Afghan refugees will be denied the opportunity to relocate to the United States.

A supporter of Afghan refugee resettlement told the news agency that those who may be barred from entering the U.S. if the office closes include families of Afghan-American military personnel, children and relatives of Afghans residing in the U.S., and tens of thousands of Afghans who worked for the U.S. government during the 20-year war in Afghanistan.

The office, which expanded its operations in October 2022, has so far relocated approximately 118,000 Afghans to the United States.

The White House has yet to issue an official statement regarding the closure of this office.

In a statement, the Taliban accused the ICC of acting on political motives rather than principles of justice and fairness. The announcement follows a request by ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan for arrest warrants against Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and Supreme Court Chief Abdul Hakim Haqqani.

Afghanistan became a member of the ICC in 2003 under the Rome Statute, which established the court as the world’s only permanent tribunal for prosecuting war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

On Thursday, the Taliban administration issued a statement asserting that while it seeks engagement with all countries based on mutual respect, it does not accept the ICC’s approach.

The Taliban stated: “In many countries, including Afghanistan, millions of innocent people—most of them women, children, and civilians—have suffered atrocities, yet this so-called ‘court’ has remained silent.”

The group also accused the ICC of failing to hold foreign occupiers and their allies accountable for war crimes committed against Afghan civilians. Citing these reasons, the Taliban declared that it does not recognise the Rome Statute and does not consider itself legally bound by the ICC’s jurisdiction.

ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan has requested arrest warrants for Hibatullah Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, accusing them of crimes against humanity, including gender-based persecution and violence.

On 23 January, Khan announced that he had asked ICC judges in The Hague to approve arrest warrants against the two Taliban officials, stating that Afghan women, girls, and LGBTQ+ individuals are facing unprecedented, unimaginable, and ongoing persecution under the Taliban’s rule.

Since seizing power in August 2021, the Taliban has banned women from employment, most public spaces, and education beyond sixth grade.

Last year, Hibatullah Akhundzada issued a decree prohibiting the installation of windows overlooking areas where women sit or stand.

In August 2024, marking three years since the Taliban’s return to power, UNESCO reported that at least 1.4 million Afghan girls have been denied secondary education, putting an entire generation’s future at risk.

The ICC, established in July 2002, aims to end the culture of impunity for serious crimes. Afghanistan joined the court a year after its founding, but the Taliban now claims it does not recognise the former government’s accession to the Rome Statute.

These documents define a political vision based on a democratic system, international relations, human rights, and an economic framework.

In a statement, participants of the conference highlighted that the roadmap presents a coordinated and strategic approach for establishing a sustainable, democratic, and inclusive future in Afghanistan. They emphasised that these documents are the result of extensive consultations and expert contributions from the working groups within the Vienna Process.

According to the statement, the political vision approved by Taliban opponents outlines the principles and framework for a democratic and participatory system, grounded in free elections, equal citizenship rights, and the rule of law.

The resolution also details strategies for international relations, focusing on engaging the Afghan people with the global community, developing diplomatic relations, and mobilising international political and economic support.

In terms of human rights, the Taliban opponents stated that the documents propose mechanisms for protecting the rights of women, children, and ethnic groups in Afghanistan. The plan also includes serious measures for ensuring justice, including prosecuting human rights violators.

The economic framework addresses strategies for sustainable development, poverty reduction, natural resource management, and attracting foreign investment to create jobs and improve public welfare.

A major decision taken at the Fifth Vienna Conference was the formation of a National Commission composed of 19 members.

According to the statement, this commission will be responsible for finalising key documents, proposing solutions to the crisis, and establishing inclusive political structures based on previous declarations and the outcomes of working group discussions.

The Taliban’s opponents have called on the international community to adopt a targeted and practical approach in shaping Afghanistan’s future and assisting in the creation of a transitional government.

Participants at the Vienna meeting also urged the international community to recognise the approved documents and roadmap as the foundation for a just and inclusive political system. They emphasised that Afghanistan requires a legitimate and representative government that upholds Islamic values and the rule of law.

The Fifth Vienna Conference commenced on Tuesday, bringing together dozens of anti-Taliban figures. During the meeting, Ahmad Massoud and Yasin Zia, leaders of armed opposition groups, reiterated their commitment to continuing the fight against the Taliban until Afghanistan is liberated.

In an interview with Afghanistan International, Mohammad Mohaqiq, leader of the People’s Islamic Unity Party of Afghanistan, highlighted internal divisions within the Taliban. He suggested that opposition figures within the Taliban, such as Sirajuddin Haqqani and Mullah Baradar, could eventually join the Vienna Process.

Meanwhile, Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban’s spokesperson, dismissed the Fifth Vienna Meeting as a “failed attempt”. He called on political opponents of the Taliban to return to Afghanistan, insisting that the world has recognised Afghanistan as being under the rule of a “strong regime.”

During a meeting with UN Secretary-General António Guterres in New York, Dar emphasised the need for international assistance in addressing security threats originating from Afghan territory.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that Dar raised concerns over terrorism in Afghanistan and sought UN support in countering militant groups operating within the country.

The Pakistani Foreign Minister also reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to providing humanitarian aid to millions of impoverished Afghans and supporting economic development through infrastructure and communication projects linking Central Asia with Pakistan.

Dar further reiterated Pakistan’s dedication to global peace and security as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. In response, Guterres expressed gratitude for Pakistan’s active engagement in the UN, particularly its contributions to peacekeeping operations.

Dar’s appeal comes amid an escalation in attacks by armed groups, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), following the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan.

Pakistani officials have repeatedly claimed that these groups have acquired military equipment left behind by NATO forces and are operating from Afghan territory. The Taliban, however, has dismissed these allegations, insisting that the activities of Pakistani militant groups are Pakistan’s internal issue.

Previously, Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper reported that while the Afghan Taliban maintains that Afghan soil is not being used against any country, a UN report confirmed that the Taliban has provided logistical, operational, and financial support to the TTP.

According to the report, the Taliban has offered financial assistance to TTP leaders and facilitated the establishment of new training centres for the group’s fighters in the provinces of Kunar, Nangarhar, Khost, and Paktika.

On 24 December 2024, the Pakistan Army carried out airstrikes in Paktika, targeting alleged TTP hideouts. The Taliban later reported that at least 46 people were killed in the attacks.

The documents, published by the hacker group “TalibLeaks”, show that the Taliban’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has instructed its embassy in Tehran to raise the issue with the New Zealand embassy in Iran.

At the request of the border police, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has sought clarification regarding the validity of the New Zealand visa issued to the Afghan individual.

Border police officers are typically trained to distinguish genuine travel and consular documents from forgeries and are equipped with specialist tools for this purpose. However, since the Taliban’s return to power, the group has replaced many trained personnel in civilian and military institutions with its own appointees.

Many of these newly appointed officials lack formal education and have primarily received training in religious schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan.