Haqqania Madrassa Chief Hamidul Haq Haqqani Killed In Pakistan Mosque Explosion

According to the statement, the individuals received between 29 and 39 lashes, though no details were provided regarding their alleged offences. The punishment was carried out in the presence of local Taliban officials, court attendees, and the public.

Within the past week, the Taliban’s Supreme Court has publicly punished at least 39 people, including eight women, across Afghanistan.

Human rights organisations have repeatedly condemned such corporal punishments, describing them as a violation of fundamental rights. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have classified these acts as torture and inhumane treatment, arguing that they contravene Afghanistan’s international obligations.

Rights groups and the United Nations have urged the Taliban to uphold fair trial standards and abolish punishments that violate human dignity. The UN has also expressed growing concern over the Taliban’s increasing use of corporal punishment.

In a statement to Afghanistan International, the BBC clarified that UK sanctions apply only to specific individuals and entities within the Taliban, not to all Afghan institutions, such as Radio Television Afghanistan (RTA).

The UK-based investigative news outlet UnHerd reported on Wednesday that the BBC had made substantial payments to the Taliban, raising concerns about possible sanctions violations. The report accused the broadcaster of compromising professional journalism standards to appease the Taliban.

However, the BBC refuted these claims, asserting that its professional integrity remains intact. It stated that payments made were solely for renting space at the national television station to facilitate FM radio broadcasts, ensuring the delivery of “independent and impartial news” across Afghanistan.

The broadcaster also emphasised that it has stringent measures in place to prevent sanctions violations. According to the BBC, UK sanctions do not apply to the Taliban as a whole but rather to specific individuals and organisations.

Responding to allegations that Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban’s Interior Minister, and Mohammad Yousuf Ahmadi, head of Afghanistan’s national broadcaster, are on the sanctions list, the BBC explained that a public entity led by a sanctioned individual is not automatically subject to restrictions.

The BBC stated that its rental payments for FM network operations in Afghanistan were necessary and that it had only rented a small space within the national broadcaster’s premises to house its equipment. It further clarified that security coverage included in the rental agreement was incidental.

The broadcaster reiterated that Afghanistan’s national television network is not subject to UK sanctions.

The BBC also addressed another claim from UnHerd, which reported that Jacky Martens, the BBC’s South Asia Bureau Chief, met with Sirajuddin Haqqani in Kabul in 2022. The BBC stated that it is standard practice for senior BBC managers to engage with political leaders and officials worldwide, including members of the Taliban administration.

In response to UnHerd’s assertion that the BBC had stopped broadcasting Western music to avoid Taliban censorship, the organisation clarified that dedicated music programmes for its Afghan service were discontinued over a decade ago. However, it confirmed that its Nawroz 1403 programme, recorded in London, was broadcast across its radio, television, and digital platforms.

The BBC confirmed that it signed a memorandum of understanding with RTA to continue operations in Afghanistan but insisted that it does not provide any financial support, training, or equipment through BBC Media Action.

The broadcaster acknowledged that, like any organisation operating in Afghanistan, it is required to pay taxes and legal fees such as vehicle registration and permits. However, it stressed that these payments are standard legal obligations and do not amount to a violation of international sanctions.

The Associated Press reported that over 5,000 trucks carrying perishable goods, including fruits and vegetables, are stranded, awaiting the reopening of the crossing.

Pakistani officials estimate that the prolonged closure has resulted in approximately $12 million in losses for traders. The disruption has severely impacted transportation networks, leaving both traders and travellers in limbo.

Pakistan closed the Torkham crossing last Friday following a dispute over the installation of a signboard by Pakistani authorities and the subsequent construction of a Taliban security checkpoint.

Despite multiple rounds of negotiations between Taliban and Pakistani border officials, no agreement has been reached, and the crossing remains closed.

The report, published by the research division of The Economist magazine, awarded Afghanistan a score of just 0.25 out of 10, highlighting the extreme repression under Taliban rule.

According to the report, Afghanistan is now more oppressive than Myanmar and North Korea, which follow closely in the rankings. The Taliban administration is classified in the “authoritarian” category, with no electoral governance, political participation, or civil liberties.

The EIU, a research institution with over 75 years of experience, provides political and economic analysis to governments, corporations, and financial institutions. With a network of 400 analysts, it assesses complex geopolitical and economic situations worldwide.

Afghanistan Ranks Last in the 2024 Democracy Index

Afghanistan’s position at the bottom of the rankings reflects its status as the most closed and repressive regime in the world. Unlike North Korea and Myanmar, which have structured governance systems, the Taliban rule without a constitution, relying solely on rigid religious decrees. Under their rule, freedoms of speech, political participation, and women’s rights have been completely eliminated. Girls’ education, women’s employment, and minority rights are also strictly banned.

Breakdown of Afghanistan’s Democracy Index Score

Electoral Process and Pluralism

Afghanistan, along with Sudan, Syria, the Central African Republic, Turkmenistan, and Laos, scored zero in this category, indicating a complete absence of credible electoral processes.

Government Functioning

Afghanistan, Sudan, Syria, and Myanmar also scored zero in terms of governance efficiency, transparency, and accountability. Laos (2.86) and North Korea (2.50) scored slightly higher, as their authoritarian systems operate in a more structured manner.

Political Participation

Afghanistan is the only country in the report to receive a 0.00 in political participation, reflecting a complete lack of citizen engagement in governance, even among elites or groups close to the Taliban.

Political Culture

In the political culture index, which assesses public support for democratic values, Afghanistan scored 1.25. This highlights the Taliban’s rigid ideological control. In contrast, Turkmenistan (5.00) and Sudan (5.63) scored higher, indicating that some segments of their populations still lean towards democratic ideals, despite authoritarian rule.

Civil Liberties

The civil liberties index, which evaluates freedom of speech, assembly, and the rights of women and minorities, awarded Afghanistan a score of zero, placing it alongside Syria, Myanmar, and North Korea. This confirms the absolute suppression of social and civil freedoms under Taliban rule.

The Democracy Index 2024 serves as yet another warning about the severe restrictions imposed by the Taliban, reinforcing their status as the most repressive regime in the world today.

Khalid Zadran, the Taliban’s police spokesperson in Kabul, confirmed the scale of surveillance, stating: “We monitor the entire city of Kabul from here.”

The BBC report, published on Thursday, noted that Taliban officials claim the CCTV system is designed to combat crime. However, critics warn that the surveillance network may be used to suppress dissent and enforce the Taliban’s strict laws.

Inside the control centre, Taliban officers sit in rows, monitoring live footage from thousands of cameras across Kabul, a city of six million people. The system tracks everything from vehicle licence plates to individuals’ facial expressions.

Zadran explained: “In certain neighbourhoods, when we notice groups of people and suspect they might be involved in drug use, criminal activities, or something suspicious, we quickly reach out to the local police.” He added that the Taliban police act swiftly to investigate such gatherings.

The BBC described the rapid expansion of CCTV cameras in Kabul as a sign of the Taliban’s evolving approach to law enforcement. Under the previous government, the city had only 850 cameras. Since the Taliban took power, that number has surged to 90,000.

Concerns Over BBC’s Relationship with the Taliban

The report comes amid allegations by UnHerd, a UK-based investigative media outlet, that the BBC and its charity arm, BBC Media Action, have made substantial payments to the Taliban.

According to UnHerd, the BBC has avoided broadcasting news that might anger the Taliban and has allegedly pressured its journalists to comply with Taliban directives. The BBC’s press office denied the claims, calling the UnHerd report inaccurate.

UnHerd also found that while the Taliban banned other media outlets, such as Voice of America and Radio Free Europe (Radio Azadi), the BBC has been allowed to operate freely in Afghanistan.

Surveillance and Facial Recognition Technology

The BBC report revealed that the Taliban’s surveillance network includes advanced facial recognition technology.

One of the control room monitors categorises individuals based on age, gender, beard length, and whether they are wearing a face covering. Zadran told the BBC: “On clear days, we can zoom in on individuals who are kilometres away.”

The Taliban even use the system to monitor their own forces. At one checkpoint, officers used surveillance cameras to zoom in on a car’s boot, inspecting its contents remotely.

The Taliban’s Interior Ministry claims that the CCTV system has significantly improved security, reduced crime, and helped police apprehend criminals more efficiently.

However, human rights organisations have raised serious concerns about who is being monitored and for how long.

Human Rights Groups Raise Alarms

Amnesty International warned that the Taliban’s mass surveillance, justified as a security measure, could be used to enforce their strict rules and suppress freedoms—particularly those of women.

Fariba, a young Kabul resident who has been unemployed since the Taliban takeover, expressed fears that surveillance cameras could be used to monitor women’s dress codes. “There is significant concern that the cameras may be used to check whether women are complying with hijab rules,” she told the BBC.

Since August 2021, the Taliban has mandated full-face coverings for women. Fariba also worries that the surveillance system could further endanger activists and former government employees who are already in hiding.

The BBC report noted that the Taliban claims access to the CCTV system is restricted to the police and is not used by the Ministry of Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice. However, Human Rights Watch pointed out that Afghanistan lacks data protection laws, meaning there are no regulations governing how surveillance footage is stored or used.

Taliban police stated that CCTV footage is stored for three months and is handled secretly by trained personnel.

Chinese Technology and Forced Contributions

The BBC observed that the cameras were likely manufactured in China, with control room monitors displaying the logo of Dahua, a Chinese company linked to Beijing.

Additionally, some residents in Kabul were reportedly forced to help fund the installation of surveillance cameras.

Shella, a resident of Kabul, told the BBC that people in her neighbourhood were pressured into contributing money for camera installations. “If families refused to pay, they were threatened with water and power cuts within three days,” she said.

The Taliban’s CCTV surveillance network is not limited to Kabul. The group has begun expanding the system to other major Afghan cities, further increasing concerns over mass monitoring and control.