Pakistan Must Engage Taliban To Tackle Terrorism, Says KP Adviser

Speaking to Tasnim News Agency, Nabipour said he hopes to speed up the deportation process. He also criticised opposition to the expulsions, accusing “certain political groups” of trying to retain foreign nationals in Iran for political reasons.

Iranian officials frequently refer to Afghan migrants as “foreign nationals.” During a press conference on Saturday, Nabipour stated that the Iranian public supports the deportations. He argued that “resources should not be shared between foreigners and fellow citizens.”

The crackdown comes amid increasing restrictions on Afghan migrants in Iran. In recent months, authorities have banned Afghans from working and renting homes in several cities.

The human rights organisation Hengaw has warned of growing anti-Afghan sentiment in Iran. In a statement, it reported a rise in both state-sponsored and social discrimination against Afghan migrants.

Referring to the recent attack on a train in Balochistan, the newspaper claimed that the Taliban are acting in line with India’s strategy to legitimise Baloch separatists.

On Saturday, Express Tribune published an article titled “Kabul-Delhi Nexus”, stating: “It is no secret that Afghanistan and India are in cahoots, and have a vested agenda to nurse by bleeding and destabilising Pakistan.”

The newspaper, known for its alignment with the Pakistani military, described the train attack in Balochistan as an “intelligence failure.” It urged Islamabad to expose what it called “open-and-shut complicity” at diplomatic forums.

However, the publication criticised the international community for ignoring Pakistan’s complaints. It questioned why Pakistan’s evidence of foreign involvement in terrorism was not being acknowledged by the United Nations and other global powers.

While Islamabad claims to be a victim of terrorism, both India and the Taliban accuse Pakistan of using militant groups as proxies. India has long labelled Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism. In recent years, the Taliban, once closely aligned with Islamabad, have made similar allegations. Taliban officials claim that Pakistan uses ISIS to advance its regional influence.

Taliban spokespersons have previously stated that ISIS has bases in Pakistan’s Balochistan province.

Earlier, a spokesperson for the Pakistani military accused the Taliban and India of planning the Jaffar Express attack from Afghan soil. The Taliban, however, rejected these claims and urged Pakistan to stop “blaming Afghanistan for its own failures.”

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s Minister of Railways, Hanif Abbasi, warned on Saturday that those responsible for terrorist acts, whether inside Pakistan or fleeing to Afghanistan and other countries, would not be spared.

Speaking at a press conference in Lahore, Abbasi stressed the need to investigate the resurgence of terrorism in Pakistan. He also warned that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) was being targeted by international forces seeking to weaken Pakistan’s growing economic strength.

Peter Reynolds, 79, and his wife Barbie, 75, were arrested by the Taliban on 2 February while returning to their home in Bamiyan.

Entwistle has expressed deep concern over her parents' health condition and described their detention as "cruel." She told The Sunday Times that the Taliban has informed her mother that she cannot see her husband. She added that her father has been taken to an undisclosed location in a heavily guarded prison, and his health has "deteriorated significantly."

She fears that her father suffers from a chest infection, an eye infection, and severe digestive issues due to poor nutrition. Without immediate access to essential medication, she believes his life is in grave danger.

Entwistle claimed that her father has been beaten and shackled during his detention. She called for the immediate release of her parents, saying, "Our desperate appeal to the Taliban is that they release them to their home, where they have the medication he needs to survive."

She added that her family, including her three brothers, has learned that male prisoners in Taliban custody receive three meals a day, while female inmates are given only one.

The Daily Mail previously reported that the couple was arrested for "teaching parenting skills to Afghan mothers." However, the Taliban claimed they were detained due to a "misunderstanding" over allegedly holding fake Afghan passports. The Sunday Times also suggested they were arrested for conducting a course that trained women in maternal skills.

Entwistle refuted the allegations, stating that her parents had official permission for their programme. She also noted that her mother was the first woman to receive a certificate of appreciation from the Taliban.

Earlier, The Telegraph quoted sources suggesting that the Haqqani network detained the British couple as a "political move" to exert international pressure on Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada.

The Taliban’s Ministry of Interior confirmed the arrest on 26 February. Abdul Mateen Qani, the ministry's spokesperson, said authorities were investigating the case and would work to release the British nationals "as soon as possible."

The couple has been running Rebuild, an organisation in Afghanistan that provides educational training for businesses, schools, and non-governmental groups.

The Daily Mail previously reported that the Taliban had searched their home to determine whether Peter and Barbie were involved in religious proselytisation.

Their children stated that their parents married in Kabul in 1970 and have lived in Afghanistan for 18 years.

The book In the Name of My Father: Struggling for Freedom in Afghanistan, written by the leader of the National Resistance Front (NRF), discusses the Afghan people’s fight for freedom. It focuses on the NRF’s resistance against the Taliban and other extremist groups. Massoud presents his views on democracy, human rights, and the necessity of opposing authoritarian and terrorist forces.

Flynn, a retired U.S. Army officer, briefly served as Trump’s National Security Adviser in 2017. He resigned after 22 days following revelations about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and for providing misleading information to then-Vice President Mike Pence.

His name later surfaced in Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. However, in November 2020, Trump granted him a presidential pardon.

Despite his resignation, Flynn remains active in U.S. politics and media. He continues to be a prominent figure among Trump supporters and frequently comments on national security and foreign policy issues.

The New York Times first reported that the proposed ban could affect 43 countries. Sources told Reuters that the restrictions would be less extensive than those imposed during Trump’s first presidency. However, internal government memos indicate that the list could still change before being finalised.

The draft proposal divides the affected nations into three categories. The “Red List” includes 11 countries whose citizens would be completely banned from entering the US The “Orange List” features 10 nations whose citizens would face strict travel restrictions but not a complete ban. The “Yellow List” includes 22 countries given 60 days to improve their immigration security or risk stricter measures.

The ban closely resembles Trump’s 2017 travel restrictions, which initially barred entry from eight countries. That policy was later modified and upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018.

On 20 January 2025, Trump signed an executive order tightening security screening for foreign nationals. The order mandates that government agencies submit a list of countries requiring full or partial travel suspensions by 21 March. The move is part of Trump’s broader immigration agenda, a key priority of his second term.

If enacted, the ban could have major consequences for immigration, diplomacy, and the economies of affected nations. Critics argue that the policy is discriminatory, while Trump’s supporters view it as necessary for national security.

It remains unclear whether those already holding US visas or Green Cards will be exempt. The recent revocation of a Syrian-Palestinian student’s residency status has raised concerns about the broader impact of the policy.

Many of the targeted nations are Muslim-majority or developing countries. However, some inclusions, such as Bhutan and Russia, have raised questions. Venezuela’s placement on the list may also complicate recent US diplomatic efforts with Caracas.

When Joe Biden took office in 2021, he revoked Trump’s previous travel ban, calling it a “stain on our national conscience.” However, Trump has argued that such measures are essential for protecting the US from security threats. His latest executive order claims that the policy will prevent individuals with extremist ideologies or those seeking to exploit US immigration laws from entering the country.