Taliban Detain Three Journalists In Takhar, Subject Them To Torture

Previously, Afghan drivers were allowed to enter using a Temporary Admission Document (TAD), a one-year entry permit issued to facilitate trade and accommodate those lacking formal travel documentation, particularly individuals with tribal affiliations spanning both sides of the border.

New notices posted at the Torkham border crossing state that, from the end of May, all Afghan nationals must present both a valid passport and visa to enter and reside in Pakistan. The shift marks the end of entry arrangements that had enabled many Afghan drivers to work without standard travel documents.

The change comes despite earlier efforts to boost bilateral trade by easing border procedures for Afghan drivers. According to Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper, citing border officials, the temporary entry permits will no longer be issued or renewed.

In response to the policy shift, a delegation of local traders and drivers met with the Taliban’s consul in Peshawar, requesting that discussions be held with Pakistani authorities to reconsider or extend the previous entry system.

In a post on the social media platform X, Bennett stressed the importance of the issue, warning that equating Pashtun identity with support for the Taliban or assuming safety under Taliban rule is “false, discriminatory, and harmful.”

His remarks come in response to a report by the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung, which claimed that following a series of violent incidents involving Afghan nationals in Germany last year, Switzerland’s migration office had proposed a controversial plan to deport asylum seekers of Pashtun ethnicity to Afghanistan.

Reacting to the report, the Swiss State Secretariat for Migration told Afghanistan International that it does not make distinctions based on ethnicity when assessing deportation cases. The office confirmed that deportation based on ethnic background has never been part of its policy.

The issue has sparked renewed concern among rights advocates and refugee communities, who warn against the dangers of ethnic profiling in European migration policy.

The announcement was made during Al Ketbi’s meeting on Tuesday with Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs. A statement from Baradar’s office noted that the two sides discussed strengthening bilateral relations, with a particular focus on economic cooperation.

According to the Taliban, Al Ketbi also expressed the UAE’s interest in developing infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, including railways and roads, a key priority for the Taliban regime as it seeks foreign investment to boost the country’s struggling economy.

The Taliban have frequently reported expressions of interest from regional countries in Afghanistan’s infrastructure and investment sectors. However, concrete details or timelines for the launch of such projects have yet to be disclosed.

Speaking on Tuesday at the Institute of Regional Studies in Islamabad, Sadiq revealed that the Afghan Taliban are hesitant to confront the TTP due to fears that internal divisions could prompt further defections of their own fighters to ISIS. However, he confirmed that such defections have already occurred, with some Taliban members having joined ISIS, the TTP, and other militant groups.

This marks the first time a senior Pakistani diplomat has publicly admitted to defections within Taliban ranks to rival extremist groups. While Sadiq did not specify the motivations behind these defections, he highlighted the Taliban’s reluctance to act decisively against TTP elements operating from Afghan soil.

He criticised the Taliban for failing to address Pakistan’s persistent security concerns, despite diplomatic engagement including a recent visit to Kabul by Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. “It seems there are internal disagreements among the Taliban on this issue,” Sadiq said, alluding to reported tensions between the Kandahar-based Taliban leadership and the Haqqani network over how to manage the TTP.

Observers suggest that the Haqqani network, which holds significant influence in eastern Afghanistan, continues to provide shelter to TTP operatives, a major point of contention for Pakistan. Sadiq stressed that the TTP remains not only a direct threat to Pakistan’s security but also a serious obstacle to stable relations between the two neighbouring countries.

Reflecting on the past, Sadiq said there had been an opportunity to address the TTP issue following Pakistan’s military Operation Zarb-e-Azb in 2014, which drove many militants from North Waziristan into Afghanistan. Some remained behind as sleeper cells, complicating efforts to dismantle the group entirely.

He also lamented that the TTP issue was overlooked during the US-Taliban peace negotiations in Doha, which culminated in the Taliban’s return to power in 2021. Since then, militant violence has surged in Pakistan, with Islamabad claiming that groups such as the TTP operate freely from Afghan territory, an allegation consistently denied by the Taliban, who insist Afghanistan is not being used as a base for cross-border attacks.

According to Sadiq, the Taliban fear that cracking down on TTP may drive their fighters into the arms of ISIS-K, a rival extremist faction with whom they have a fraught relationship. “The Taliban control the cities, villages, and regions of Afghanistan, but they do not appear weary of war,” he said, pointing to ongoing instability and factional divisions within Afghan society.

Sadiq also disclosed that suicide bombers are sometimes trained in clandestine centres and then transferred or ‘sold’ to other extremist groups, further complicating the region’s security landscape. He noted that even under the previous Afghan government led by Ashraf Ghani, the TTP was recognised as a threat to Afghan national security, and several of its leaders were apprehended.

In closing, Sadiq reiterated that Pakistan’s future relations with the Taliban government would hinge on their commitment to curbing TTP activity and ensuring Afghan soil is not used to stage attacks against Pakistan.

The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) told Afghanistan International that it does not discriminate between individuals on the basis of ethnicity when repatriating Afghan nationals. The agency emphasised that deportations based on ethnicity have never been part of its official policy.

SEM stated that decisions on asylum or deportation are made through continuous assessment of the security and humanitarian conditions in countries of origin. According to the agency, this monitoring process is ongoing and adjustments are implemented when necessary.

The controversy stems from a report published on Sunday by Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), which claimed that the Swiss migration authorities had considered a proposal to deport Afghan asylum seekers belonging to the Pashtun ethnic group. The internal documents reportedly suggested that Pashtuns being ethnically aligned with the ruling Taliban are at lower risk of persecution compared to other Afghan minorities.

NZZ reported that senior SEM officials in Bern drafted a politically sensitive plan that would mark a significant shift in Switzerland’s asylum policy, as the country has never previously enacted deportations based on ethnic classification.

The newspaper further noted that the fall of the Afghan government on 15 August 2021 enabled the Taliban to assume control over the entire country, bringing a degree of stability that has increased pressure on European nations to repatriate Afghan nationals. In Switzerland, Afghan asylum seekers had long enjoyed basic residency rights, and deportations were previously rare. However, in the past year, the first deportations of Afghan nationals were carried out in response to criminal convictions.

Since April 2025, Swiss authorities have indicated that healthy, single Afghan men with family ties in Afghanistan may also face deportation. SEM clarified that this applies only to a small subset of individuals and reiterated that no ethnic distinctions are made in these cases.

Despite SEM’s assurances, internal documents obtained by NZZ last autumn reportedly reflect a shift in attitudes toward Afghan asylum seekers. Public sentiment, once largely sympathetic after the fall of Kabul, has shifted amid rising concerns about terrorism and criminality.

This change has been exacerbated by a series of high-profile Islamist attacks in Germany. In May last year, an Afghan supporter of ISIS fatally stabbed a police officer and injured five others in a public attack. In a separate incident in February, a 24-year-old Afghan man drove a vehicle into a crowd in Munich, killing a mother and her two-year-old child and injuring 54 others. Both perpetrators were asylum seekers residing in Germany.

Magdalena Rast, spokesperson for SEM, confirmed that Switzerland’s asylum and return policy for Afghan nationals was most recently revised in April 2025, and categorically denied any policy involving ethnic profiling.