Taliban Education Delegation Attends International Forum In Russia

In an open letter, the organisations claimed Rahimi is not acting as a neutral diplomat and has expressed loyalty to the Taliban. They raised concerns over his continued presence at the Afghan Embassy in The Hague, particularly in light of Afghanistan’s ongoing human rights crisis, including widespread violations of women’s rights.

Rahimi, who previously served under the former Afghan government, was among the first officials to declare cooperation with the Taliban following their takeover in 2021. According to sources cited by Afghanistan International, Rahimi receives between $20,000 and $30,000 per month from the group.

He has reportedly travelled to Kabul and met with Taliban officials to discuss ongoing cooperation. Rahimi also came under criticism after removing the national emblem and flag of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan from the embassy’s social media platforms and website. Following public backlash, the symbols were later restored.

In the letter, obtained by Afghanistan International, the signatory organisations accused Rahimi of violating diplomatic neutrality and misusing embassy resources in Europe to unofficially represent Taliban interests.

The groups urged the Dutch government to clarify the legal and political status of the Afghan Embassy in The Hague and conduct a thorough review of its operations in line with the Netherlands’ obligations under international human rights conventions.

They stated that, should any formal affiliation with the Taliban be confirmed, the embassy’s diplomatic activities must be suspended.

The organisations warned that continuing to accommodate a figure allegedly aligned with a group accused of widespread human rights abuses would undermine the Netherlands’ credibility as a defender of international human rights.

The controversy comes as the International Criminal Court in The Hague investigates potential arrest warrants for senior Taliban leaders, including Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani. The presence of key international legal institutions in the city, they noted, further underscores the importance of scrutinising the Afghan Embassy’s operations.

Isa Bozorgzadeh, spokesperson for Iran’s water industry, said in a press conference that the Taliban had not upheld the terms of the 1973 Helmand River Treaty and had delivered only a small volume of water to Iran.

“According to the 1973 treaty, Afghanistan is obligated to deliver a specified share of Helmand River water to Iran. However, since the beginning of the current water year, only about 119 million cubic metres of water have entered the country, a figure significantly below expectations,” Bozorgzadeh said.

He noted that although a recent meeting between commissioners from both countries had taken place and diplomatic channels remained open, no “concrete outcome” had yet been reached.

Emphasising Iran’s commitment to international agreements, Bozorgzadeh acknowledged the severity of the regional drought but said water flow to Iran should still be higher than it currently is. He warned that eastern Iran particularly the Sistan and Baluchestan province is facing a worsening water crisis.

“Iran expects its neighbours to fulfil their obligations within the framework of regional norms and international law,” he added.

The Taliban, however, maintains that it is complying with the treaty. Speaking during a recent visit to Iran, Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi said his government was committed to honouring the water-sharing agreement, despite the drought that has gripped much of Afghanistan.

“Delivering water to Iran is a religious and Islamic responsibility,” Muttaqi said. “Our goal is to prevent water wastage and ensure it reaches Iran properly. This is a virtuous act and a positive political step.”

He stressed that water shortages were not isolated to Iran, but also impacted Afghan provinces such as Nimruz, Helmand, Farah and Baluchistan. Muttaqi claimed that in the absence of drought, water would flow naturally into Iran, as it had over the past month.

The dispute over Helmand River water rights has long strained relations between Tehran and Kabul. Some Iranian officials have accused the Taliban of deliberately restricting water flow to Iran by constructing dams and diverting the river.

Muttaqi did not directly address those accusations but reiterated that Afghanistan’s intent was to use water efficiently and minimise waste.

The Helmand River Treaty was signed in 1973 between Mohammad Musa Shafiq, then Prime Minister of Afghanistan, and Amir-Abbas Hoveyda, then Prime Minister of Iran, under the Afghan monarchy. Despite political changes in both countries since then, the agreement remains in force though implementation remains a source of contention.

In an interview with Ariana News, Mujahid stated that while the cabinet remains temporary, all ministers and department heads have been granted full powers by the group’s leadership.

“The Taliban leadership has granted full authority and powers to the ministers and heads of departments, which are exercised within the framework of the institutions,” he said. “Being in an acting position does not mean their powers are limited.”

Since seizing power in August 2021, the Taliban have maintained that their cabinet is provisional and that a permanent government would be formed after further evaluation. Nearly four years later, however, all key posts remain filled on an acting basis, with no clear timeline for formal appointments.

Mujahid described the arrangement as being in the interest of both the regime and the Afghan people, though he declined to elaborate on the specific political factors preventing permanent appointments.

Observers note that such prolonged rule by acting officials is highly unusual in modern governance. No internationally recognised government has continued in this manner for such an extended period, raising concerns about the Taliban’s political intentions and internal cohesion.

Citing Afghanistan’s history of conflict, he warned that a return to “violent methods of the past and renewed reliance on foreigners” would plunge the country back into previous crises.

Hekmatyar stressed the damaging effects of foreign intervention, the need for national consensus and the importance of sincere engagement among political actors to achieve sustainable peace.

He emphasised that political power should be transferred peacefully through the people’s vote and collective will, adding that no individual or group should seize authority through force, coups or foreign backing.

“It is the religious and human right of the nation to entrust divine leadership to someone worthy of the responsibility,” Hekmatyar wrote. “We will only accept a leader, and refrain from opposing him, if the majority of people recognise him as such.”

He called for the establishment of an Islamic system in Afghanistan, rooted in religious principles. He also criticised recent remarks by some former Afghan leaders and urged the rejection of violent tactics.

He condemned what he described as “the absolute despotism of a tribe, family or individual,” and, reflecting on Afghanistan’s history of coup-driven regimes, said that preventing future disasters would require resisting threats and ending violence.

Those in or vying for power, he said, must avoid “bloody and inhumane” means of attaining or holding authority.

Hekmatyar also called for the creation of a council that genuinely represents the people, asserting that Afghans must have a direct and decisive role in key national issues including domestic policy, foreign relations, war and peace.

He argued that no government should unilaterally decide such matters and noted the current absence of a constitution. A proper constitution, he said, should clearly define the country’s political and social system, as well as the rights and powers of its institutions.

“The only legitimate body to draft and approve such a constitution,” he wrote, “is a council elected by the people, one that represents national consensus and the collective will of the nation.”

Mutawakil previously served as head of ideological affairs at the Taliban’s Ministry of Defence.

According to reports, the legal and diplomatic procedures for Mutawakil’s formal entry into Mashhad are under way, and he is expected to officially assume his duties as the Taliban’s new consul general in the city.

Tasnim News Agency reported on Monday that Anwar Ahmad Nabil will serve as acting head of the Taliban’s consulate in Mashhad until Mutawakil officially begins his role.

Faizanullah Naseri, the former Taliban consul general in Mashhad, passed away in May due to a heart condition.