Zamir Kabulov, Russia’s special presidential envoy for Afghanistan, said the eighth Moscow Format meeting ended without a joint statement because of disagreements between the Taliban and Pakistan.
Kabulov said on Monday, 5 October, that Russia regretted that the meeting had failed to finalise a joint statement.
He said disagreements emerged between the Afghan and Pakistani colleagues during the drafting of the final statement, preventing agreement on the text.
According to Kabulov, the Taliban objected to sections of the draft that referred to Afghanistan in the context of terrorism. He said the Taliban believed Afghanistan had been mentioned too extensively in relation to terrorism in this year’s text.
The Russian presidential envoy said Moscow found the Taliban’s position surprising, as similar language had also been included in the final statement of the seventh Moscow Format meeting last year.
Kabulov added that the Taliban believed the state of bilateral relations had changed since last year and that, as a result, including the section in this year’s statement was unacceptable to them.
However, Kabulov stressed that the failure to adopt a joint statement would not prevent the Moscow Format from continuing its work.
he said that the Moscow Format can continue to operate and remain in place even without this joint statement.
Kabulov also said the Moscow Format was not intended to resolve bilateral disputes, but rather to provide a platform for coordinating regional cooperation.
The eighth Moscow Format meeting was attended by special representatives and senior officials from Afghanistan, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, India, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Belarus and Egypt also attended as guests.
Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi accused Pakistan of using force and maximum pressure against the group, saying disputes between Kabul and Islamabad should be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy, not military action.
Speaking on Monday at the eighth Moscow Format Consultations on Afghanistan, Muttaqi said the Taliban sought normal relations with all countries in the region, particularly Pakistan. However, he said the system governing Pakistan’s policy had adopted a military approach towards Afghanistan instead of pursuing political understanding.
The Taliban foreign minister said that problems with Pakistan must be resolved through dialogue. He accused Pakistani officials of resorting to force and pressure rather than political and diplomatic solutions.
Meanwhile, Zamir Kabulov, the Russian president’s special representative for Afghanistan, said the eighth Moscow Format meeting ended without a joint statement because of disagreements between the Taliban and Pakistan.
Kabulov said on Monday, October 5, that Russia regretted the failure to finalise a joint statement at the meeting.
He said disagreements emerged between the “Afghan and Pakistani colleagues” while the final statement was being drafted, preventing the sides from reaching agreement on the text.
According to Kabulov, the Taliban objected to sections of the document referring to Afghanistan in the context of terrorism. He said the Taliban believed Afghanistan had been mentioned “too extensively in relation to terrorism” in this year’s text.
The Russian presidential envoy said Moscow found the Taliban’s position “surprising”, noting that similar language had also appeared in the final statement of the seventh Moscow Format meeting last year.
Muttaqi went on to accuse the Pakistani military of targeting civilians through cross-border attacks on Afghan territory. He said Pakistani forces had targeted universities, hospitals, schools and residential homes “in violation of all principles and international laws”.
He also claimed that Pakistan had carried out air strikes in Afghanistan’s border provinces, killing and wounding civilians.
In another part of his speech, the Taliban foreign minister criticised Pakistan’s treatment of Afghan migrants, saying pressure on Afghan refugees, migrants and students in the country was continuing.
Muttaqi also accused Islamabad of attempting to destabilise Afghanistan. He claimed Pakistan was seeking to create insecurity through some former Afghan military personnel as well as the ISIS.
He said recent security incidents in Badakhshan and Nuristan provinces were also linked to Pakistani support, but provided no further details to substantiate the allegation.
Taliban officials have repeatedly accused Pakistan in recent months of supporting armed opponents of the group. Islamabad has rejected the accusations and, in turn, has called on the Taliban to prevent Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), from operating on Afghan soil.
In his speech, Muttaqi stressed that the Taliban reserved their “legitimate right to self-defence” and would not accept external pressure.
At the same time, he said the Taliban government remained committed to maintaining security in Afghanistan and assured regional countries and the wider international community that Afghan territory would not be used against any country.
The Taliban foreign minister said establishing stability in Afghanistan required cooperation from countries in the region and the wider world, arguing that security could not be achieved solely by strengthening military capabilities.
“Security is directly linked to the economy and stability,” he said, calling on regional countries and the international community to expand economic cooperation with Afghanistan rather than placing pressure on the Taliban.
Muttaqi also claimed that Islamic State had been contained in Afghanistan and that the Taliban government had succeeded in bringing the group’s threat under control. He added that drug cultivation and trafficking had also been brought under control and had declined compared with previous years.
Muttaqi’s remarks at the Moscow Format meeting come amid heightened tensions between Kabul and Islamabad in recent months. The two sides have repeatedly accused each other of supporting armed groups and contributing to instability across the border — allegations denied by both sides.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Monday that the deployment of NATO military infrastructure in Afghanistan or neighbouring countries was unacceptable, speaking at the opening of the eighth Moscow Format meeting.
Lavrov said such deployment was unacceptable under any pretext, arguing that historical experience had shown foreign military presence in Afghanistan leads to instability and increased conflict.
He said foreign military presence in Afghanistan had repeatedly led to the same negative consequences in recent decades.
Lavrov also stressed the need to strengthen Kabul’s counter-terrorism capabilities, saying it was in the interests of all regional countries to support the Taliban’s fight against Islamic State Khorasan Province and other extremist groups through material, technical and intelligence assistance.
Speaking at the Moscow Format meeting on Monday, Lavrov said the Taliban government had performed relatively successfully over the past five years and had dealt significant blows to Islamic State Khorasan Province and other terrorist groups in the security sphere.
He said hundreds of fighters had been eliminated and several major attacks, including planned attacks against foreign nationals and diplomats, had been prevented.
Lavrov said that it is a common interest to help strengthen Kabul’s counter-terrorism potential. voicing support for continued contacts between regional security and intelligence agencies and the Taliban.
The Russian official’s comments on security cooperation with the Taliban come as Moscow has repeatedly expressed concern in recent years over the threat posed by IS-K in Afghanistan, describing it as one of the main security challenges for Central Asian countries and Russia.
Lavrov also said the Taliban government had taken significant measures to curb drug production. Citing an assessment by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, he said opium production in Afghanistan had fallen by about 90% since 2022.
Despite this, the Russian foreign minister acknowledged that Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis continued. Citing UN figures, he said more than 17 million Afghans would face food insecurity during the coming winter and about 28 million people would require humanitarian assistance.
In another part of his remarks, Lavrov again opposed any deployment of NATO military infrastructure in Afghanistan or neighbouring countries, warning that such a presence could lead to further instability and an escalation of conflict in the region.
The eighth Moscow Format meeting comes as Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan and Central Asian countries have in recent months stressed the need to address cross-border terrorist threats originating from Afghanistan.
Moscow has repeatedly called on the international community to expand security cooperation with the Taliban government to prevent the spread of IS-K and other extremist groups.
A new research report published on Genocide Watch’s website warns that conditions for Afghanistan’s Hazara community have deteriorated sharply under Taliban rule.
The authors note that threats from Islamic State Khorasan Province have also significantly increased the vulnerability of Hazara communities in different parts of the country.
Examining historical roots and contemporary developments, the research report says that although ISIS is not necessarily aligned with the Taliban, its growing influence and anti-Shia ideology in different areas have contributed significantly to increasing the vulnerability of the Hazara community.
The report also cites the latest findings of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), which highlight the continuing difficult conditions faced by Hazaras. These include the killing of 12 civilians at a Shia shrine in Herat province in April 2026 and the detention of 45 Shia men in Kabul on June 18, 2026 for displaying Ashura flags.
The report also points to less visible forms of pressure, including forced displacement and apartheid. The authors say that over the past five years, the Taliban has dismantled police infrastructure in Hazara-populated areas, which they argue has contributed to insecurity.
As an example, the report cites the forced displacement of Hazara residents from the village of Pusht-e Asmidan in Sar-e Pol province in 2023. It also says that while the report was being prepared, a grenade explosion at a school in Dasht-e-Barchi injured more than 40 children.
Genocide Watch makes several recommendations aimed at improving the situation and ensuring accountability. It says international accountability mechanisms should seriously examine and investigate the Taliban’s role in facilitating attacks against Hazaras, including the dismantling of police infrastructure in Hazara areas and alleged failures to protect Shia religious gatherings and schools.
The organisation also calls on the UN Secretary-General and UNAMA to formally investigate and report on ISIS attacks against Hazaras, with the findings to be referred to the United Nations Human Rights Council.
Genocide Watch further urges donor countries and UN agencies to address barriers faced by Hazara women and girls by providing adequate funding for gender-responsive humanitarian services, including mobile health clinics and psychological support programmes.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry says Moscow is closely monitoring security along the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border and continues to provide military equipment to strengthen it. Senior diplomat Alexander Sternik stressed continued arms and technical support for Dushanbe.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said Moscow was continuously monitoring security developments along the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border and would continue supporting Dushanbe in strengthening protection of its southern frontier.
Sternik, director of the Third Department of the Commonwealth of Independent States at Russia’s Foreign Ministry, said in an interview with RIA Novosti published on Monday, October 5, that security along the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border remained a constant focus for Moscow.
The senior Russian diplomat said Russian security agencies were continuing to deliver technical equipment, military hardware and weapons to Tajik border forces as part of an interstate programme of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) aimed at strengthening the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border, approved on November 28, 2024.
He said the assistance was also being provided under a programme to modernise Tajikistan’s armed forces through 2042.
Under a decision by CSTO member-state leaders in 2024, an interstate programme to strengthen Tajikistan’s state border with Afghanistan was developed and implemented for a five-year period.
Afghanistan’s Badakhshan province, which lies along the border with Tajikistan, has experienced an increase in armed clashes in recent months.
Alongside the activities of armed opponents of the Taliban, the presence of regional extremist groups in Afghanistan has also raised security concerns among Central Asian countries.
Islamic State Khorasan Province is also active in Afghanistan, while regional countries have repeatedly expressed concern about threats posed by armed groups operating from Afghan territory.
Earlier, CSTO Secretary-General Taalatbek Masadykov expressed concern about the situation along the Afghanistan-Tajikistan border. He said the first shipments of weapons and equipment intended to strengthen the border would be delivered to Dushanbe this autumn.
According to Masadykov, Russia is playing the main role in supplying the equipment. However, he did not directly link the delivery of weapons and equipment to Tajikistan with the recent clashes in Badakhshan.
The CSTO secretary-general nevertheless stressed that the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border should be reinforced as quickly as possible, warning that any security problem in the area could also affect other member states of the organisation.
Russia’s defence minister has also said that the country’s military bases in Tajikistan have been placed on full alert to respond to potential threats.
Hassan Mortazavi, deputy head of Iran’s embassy in Kabul, says Iran and the Taliban face common opportunities and threats in the current regional and global environment. He stressed that these commonalities require cooperation between the two sides.
Referring to his recent visits to Kandahar and Balkh, Mortazavi said such trips would continue in the future as the two sides seek to pursue and safeguard their “common interests” and those of the “Islamic Ummah”.
Speaking about his visit to Kandahar and meeting with the Taliban governor, Mullah Shirin, Mortazavi said the presence of the Taliban leader had given Kandahar particular importance. He said Iran, like other countries in the region, was pursuing some important issues through Kandahar as well as Kabul.
Mortazavi said his talks with the Taliban governor covered regional issues and security, economic and border cooperation. According to him, the two sides also emphasised continued cooperation between Tehran and Kabul amid war and sanctions.
Mortazavi has been one of Iran’s active diplomats in Afghanistan since the Taliban returned to power and has met Taliban officials in Kabul, Herat, Nangarhar and several other provinces in recent years.
Some observers describe Mortazavi as a security figure with close ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Some reports have also referred to his alleged previous involvement with the IRGC’s Quds Force and his reported role in the formation of the Fatemiyoun Division.
The Iranian diplomat also said he had met Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid, with media cooperation among the issues discussed.
Speaking about his visit to Balkh and meeting with the Taliban governor, Yusuf Wafa, Mortazavi said the talks covered broader issues between Tehran and Kabul in addition to matters concerning Balkh.
According to Mortazavi, the two sides emphasised maintaining the security of both countries, countering destabilising activities and cooperating in the fight against terrorism. Economic cooperation and regional projects were also discussed with the Balkh governor.
His latest remarks come after previous comments about “resistance” against the Taliban prompted reactions. Mortazavi had earlier said Iran did not support any political or military group opposed to the Taliban in efforts to fight the group.
Mortazavi had also said Iran did not consider armed struggle against the Taliban to constitute “resistance”.
