11 Countries Demand Taliban’s Accountability For Human Rights Abuses

Sources told Afghanistan International that serious disagreements among the permanent members over engagement with the Taliban complicated the decision-making for the council.

Western Countries' Concerns

The sources mentioned that the USA, UK, and France opposed China and Russia's demands for expanding economic relations of neighbouring countries with the Taliban.

They argued that expanding relations before forming a global consensus on engagement with the Taliban would diminish the international community's leverage to influence Taliban policies.

China and Russia, have cordial relations with the Taliban and support the normalisation of relations and easing of sanctions against the group. However, they oppose the Western priority of human rights in relation with the Taliban.

The disagreements among members has prevented the Security Council from issuing a joint statement on the meeting's content and their expectations from the Taliban. Stephane Dujarric, the spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General, briefly mentioned in a press conference after the Security Council session that the Deputy Secretary-General presented a report on Afghanistan to the members, but refrained from providing further details about the meeting.

Human Rights and Women's Rights

As anticipated, some countries, including the rotating president of the Security Council, insisted on observing women's rights and establishing an inclusive government in Afghanistan during the session.

Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett, the rotating president of the Security Council, emphasised on the right to education, rights, and fundamental freedoms of women in Afghanistan.

The council's statement stressed that Afghanistan is a signatory to the Human Rights Declaration and a member of conventions on eliminating discrimination against women, children's rights, international civil rights covenants, and other human rights treaties.

Rodrigues-Birkett called on the Taliban to adhere to Afghanistan's international commitments.

Additionally, she strongly condemned the Taliban's enduring and structural gender discrimination and suppression of Afghan women and girls, urging the immediate repeal of all misogynistic policies and orders.

Meanwhile, sources told Aref Yaqubi, Afghanistan International's correspondent at the UN headquarters, that the USA, UK, Switzerland, France, South Korea, Japan, Malta, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia issued a joint statement after Monday’s session.

These countries also underscored human rights values in Afghanistan.

Special Representative

Sources indicated that appointing a special representative, who would be responsible for dealing with the Taliban on behalf of the international community with the support of countries involved in Afghanistan, was a significant topic of the session.

The Taliban have opposed the appointment of a special representative, asserting that with UNAMA's presence in Afghanistan, there is no need for another UN representative. The Taliban's Deputy Foreign Minister stated this week that Afghanistan's situation is not critical, hence the UN should not appoint a special envoy.

However, the UN Secretary-General's spokesperson stated in a press briefing that the issue of appointing a special UN representative for Afghanistan is being seriously pursued and work is ongoing.

Extension of UNAMA's Mission

Sources told Afghanistan International that participants in the Security Council session discussed UNAMA's mandates and operational structure and the special representative.

They also deliberated on extending UNAMA's mandate, which ends on March 17. UNAMA's one-year extension is expected and likely to be addressed in the next Security Council session in early March. Furthermore, according to sources, economic development, governance, aid delivery, and human rights in Afghanistan will also be discussed.

The session is expected to include the Secretary-General, the Special Coordinator, and representatives of aid organisations.

The inconclusive UN Security Council session indicates that after two years, the permanent members' positions on Afghanistan and the Taliban have not converged, and countries are reluctant to resolve differences.

The assault, as stated by the Front, was directed towards the airport's military sector, resulting in the death of four Taliban air force members and injuries to three others.

The Front conveyed through the X social media network that this offensive took place at 6:40pm on Monday.

Further details provided by the NRF highlighted that the military zone of the Kabul Airport and Taliban helicopters were the specific targets of this operation.

This incident is notably the first instance of an armed opposition group successfully executing a rocket attack towards the Kabul Airport, marking a significant moment in the ongoing conflict with the Taliban.

In a key event scheduled for the session, Richard Bennett, the UN's Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Afghanistan, will present his latest findings on the human rights conditions within the country.

Nasir Ahmad Andisha, Afghanistan's Ambassador to Switzerland and Permanent Representative to the UN Human Rights Council, represents Afghanistan at this significant gathering. Ambassador Andisha has been actively sharing snapshots from the onset of the session on his X social media account, offering a glimpse into the proceedings.

Amid the session's unfolding, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres took to X to reflect on the global landscape, noting that the world is undergoing rapid changes. The intensification of conflicts is leading to unparalleled suffering, yet human rights stand as a steadfast pillar, he noted.

The council's agenda prominently features the human rights scenario in Afghanistan during its initial week, highlighting the international community's ongoing concern for the country.

In parallel, the UN Security Council is convening a dedicated session on Afghanistan in New York, reinforcing the global focus on the nation's evolving situation.

The Taliban's recent pronouncements, asserting that any regional or global decisions contrary to their interests will not be enacted, underscore the challenges facing international diplomatic and human rights efforts.

Notably, the Taliban lack formal representation within the UN and its Human Rights Council, as the United Nations does not officially recognise the group as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

This assertion precedes the scheduled United Nations Security Council meeting on Afghanistan, set for Monday.

During an interview with Afghanistan National Radio, now under Taliban control, Mujahid expressed the group's favour towards international and regional meetings that align with the Taliban’s objectives.

Suhail Shaheen, leading the Taliban's political office in Qatar, emphasised to the press, the necessity of incorporating the Taliban's viewpoint in global resolutions to bridge disparities.

Today's United Nations Security Council session on Afghanistan unfolds in private, aiming to deliberate on the Doha discussions' aftermath and the designation of a special envoy to Afghanistan.

While Taliban’s opposing political and military factions endorse the special envoy's nomination, the Taliban deems such an appointment "unnecessary”.

A formal declaration from the court on Monday revealed the condemned as Nazar Mohammad, the son of Amanullah.

According to the Supreme Court's assertion, Nazar Mohammad was found guilty of fatally stabbing Khal Mohammad, the son of Abdul Ali, two years ago.

The dispatch detailed that the execution verdict underwent validation by three distinct Taliban judicial bodies before receiving finalisation from Hibatullah Akhundzada, the group’s supreme authority.

Further, the communique verified the dispatch of a Taliban official from Kabul to Jowzjan for the direct oversight and observation of the execution. Preceding this event, Jowzjan's Taliban governance had circulated an invitation to the residents, urging them to come to the stadium to witness the execution deemed as "retribution.”

Additionally, on the preceding Thursday, the judicial arm of the Taliban had similarly proclaimed the execution of two individuals, accused of murder, at a Ghazni province stadium.

Eyewitnesses present at the Ghazni stadium told Afghanistan International that the Taliban executed the duo by the firing squad.

These judicial actions are unfolding against a backdrop of international apprehension, voiced by human rights entities over the Taliban courts' adherence to fair trial standards.

The human rights organisation, Rawadari, in a detailed investigative report, criticised Taliban tribunals for engaging in prejudiced rulings, employing torture, eliciting coerced confessions, and a glaring deficiency in judicial independence and impartiality, thereby infringing on the foundational principle of the presumption of innocence.