Taliban Rejects Turkic States’ Call For Inclusive Afghan Government

A new online visa portal, launched in late April 2025, allows Afghans including investors, artists, athletes, students and medical patients to apply for student, business, medical, medical-attendant, entry and UN diplomat visas.

Visa categories also cover cultural figures participating in unpaid events, property owners in India and those with family members studying in the country. Applicants must upload a front-facing photograph, valid passport and national ID showing personal details, date of birth and passport expiry.

India halted visa services for Afghans following the August 2021 fall of the former government and the Taliban’s takeover. It closed its embassy and consulates in Kabul and revoked thousands of existing visas, leaving hundreds of students unable to complete their courses.

While New Delhi has yet to issue an official statement, a senior government official confirmed that the “New Afghan Visa” section is now live on the Ministry of Home Affairs immigration website.

The move follows growing diplomatic engagement between India and the Taliban regime. Last month, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar spoke by phone with Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, thanking him for condemning a “terrorist attack” in Kashmir. In November 2024, Muttaqi met with senior Indian diplomat JP Singh in Kabul and urged New Delhi to facilitate visas, especially for businessmen.

In a joint statement released on 21 May, the OTS emphasised the necessity of stronger coordination to combat terrorism within Afghanistan. The organisation, founded in 2009 to foster cooperation among Turkic-speaking nations, comprises Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye and Uzbekistan.

Describing Afghanistan as a “neighbour and brother” to the Turkic world, the leaders underscored the nation’s deep religious, cultural and historical ties with member states. They also urged Kabul to control the cultivation, production and trafficking of narcotics and voiced concern over ongoing human rights challenges.

The statement further called for sustained international humanitarian assistance “in a coherent, coordinated and structured manner,” aiming to achieve “an Afghanistan at peace with its people, its neighbours, its region and beyond, as a full-fledged member of the international community.”

Acknowledging the plight of refugees, the OTS leaders advocated for the voluntary return of Afghan migrants in the region. They concluded by urging the Taliban authorities to pursue sustainable peace, national reconciliation, stability and development in Afghanistan.

Speaking during a visit to the construction site, Bagheri said the barrier incorporates “electronic and fully smart technologies” tailored to the region’s terrain.

According to the Islamic Republic News Agency, the project includes the erection of watchtowers and border outposts at strategic intervals.

Bagheri emphasised that the wall will bolster long-term regional security and significantly curb drug trafficking, the smuggling of prohibited goods, and unauthorised crossings by Afghan nationals into Iran.

Despite Tehran’s pragmatic ties with the Taliban, Iranian officials remain wary of infiltration by extremist groups and the continued surge of undocumented Afghan migrants. The wall, Bagheri added, is a vital element in Iran’s broader strategy to manage its eastern frontier and protect national stability.

In an open letter signed by 64 groups, they call on the International Criminal Court, the United Nations, human rights agencies, the European Union, the US government and international media to investigate and prosecute Benard for “denial of gender-based violence” and “complicity in crimes against humanity.” The letter accuses her of whitewashing the Taliban regime and normalising its systemic oppression of women and girls.

Benard, an author and researcher, recently asserted that Afghan women have not been excluded from society, continue to live and work normally, and that it is safe for refugees to return.

Activists counter that her remarks contradict verified findings by the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Afghanistan, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and Amnesty International, as well as numerous survivor testimonies.

“By denying these crimes, discrediting internationally verified reports and promoting return to a regime of systemic violence, Cheryl Benard stands as a complicit actor,” the letter states. Signatories also argue that her close ties to Khalilzad, a principal architect of the US-Taliban peace process, underpin a political motive to soften the Taliban’s international image.

In an exclusive interview with Afghanistan International, Benard said that she was aware of criticism from Afghan women who accuse her of downplaying Taliban repression. She said those seeking to remain in the United States are choosing freedom, while many European countries are now pursuing deportation of Afghan refugees.

Benard said meaningful change would only come if Afghans return and challenge Taliban rule from within. “If Afghan refugees return and fight gender apartheid from within, I would support them,” she said, accusing some educated Afghan women of abandoning their less-privileged counterparts.

She described the situation in Afghanistan as gender apartheid but argued that, like apartheid-era South Africa, internal resistance is key. While criticising the Taliban’s policies on women’s education, which she called “unacceptable,” Benard said the group reflects rural and Pashtun traditions the West failed to reform during its 20-year presence.

Benard claimed security in Afghanistan is currently the best it has been in 15 years and disputed reports of widespread violence against women and former officials. She urged Afghan intellectuals to remain in the country and work toward change rather than rely on international intervention.

Describing the Taliban as pragmatic actors seeking global legitimacy, Benard said they understand that harming returnees would hurt their international standing.