Fighters Are Ready To Battle Taliban, Says Fatemiyoun Commander

In a social media post, Tofan stressed that Moldova does not recognise the Taliban regime.

He said the visit had been approved following administrative checks, but its political and diplomatic consequences had not been adequately assessed.

The Moldovan prime minister explained that the request for the visit had been submitted by a local company that exports agricultural products to Uzbekistan and wanted to expand its operations into the Afghan market.

Moldova’s Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry referred the request to the Foreign Ministry, the General Inspectorate for Migration and the country’s border police.

The reviews found that members of the Taliban delegation were not on the European Union’s sanctions list. As a result, the migration authorities gave a favourable opinion, and the Moldovan Foreign Ministry issued them visas.

According to reports, Moldova’s Intelligence and Security Service was not consulted because such consultation was not required under existing regulations.

Tofan said procedures were formally followed, but the necessary political and diplomatic assessment was not carried out.

He stressed that a sensitive issue was handled like an ordinary administrative case, and as a result, the wrong decision was made.

Tofan said government institutions should not limit themselves to following administrative procedures but must also consider the context, risks and possible consequences of their decisions.

Responding to calls for responsible officials to resign, the Moldovan prime minister said the priority should be reviewing the procedures.

He acknowledged public demands for resignations but said simply blaming one person would not resolve the issue. Instead, responsibility should be determined and the procedures that allowed the decision to occur should be reformed.

Tofan said the government would review its consultation mechanism with the Intelligence and Security Service and called for those responsible for the decision to be held accountable.

Moldova’s Foreign Ministry confirmed on Monday, 3 August, that entry visas had been issued to the Taliban Agriculture Ministry delegation.

However, the ministry stressed that no official meetings would be held with the delegation. The Moldovan government has also launched an internal review of the matter.

Residents of Lashkar Gah told Afghanistan International that most of the arrests took place around the women’s market in the Karte Lagan area of the city.

They said the measures had created fear among women and severely affected economic activity at the market.

Sardar Mohammad, a Helmand resident, said more than 10 women had been detained in the past week for allegedly failing to observe the Taliban’s hijab and dress code rules or refusing to follow the orders of ministry for the propagation of virtue and prevention of vice officers.

He added that many women were now avoiding the market for fear of arrest.

According to the source, several other women were detained at the same market over the past two days for allegedly failing to observe the required hijab and travelling without a male guardian.

Witnesses also reported an altercation between a Taliban morality police officer and a woman near the women’s market.

They said the woman intended to enter the market after getting out of a vehicle, but the Taliban officer stopped her.

According to witnesses, the officer grabbed the woman’s hand, prompting her to strike him with her shoe. The dispute then escalated into a physical confrontation, with several members of the public intervening.

Witnesses said that following the incident, Taliban morality police increased surveillance, searches and questioning of women at the market and imposed further restrictions.

Local sources said many women were now staying away from the market to avoid detention and were asking male relatives to make purchases on their behalf.

Traders at the women’s market also said the Taliban’s strict restrictions had caused a sharp fall in customer numbers and brought their businesses close to a standstill.

They said the monthly rent for each shop ranged from 20,000 to 40,000 afghanis, but declining sales had left many shopkeepers unable to pay their rent.

They warned that they would be forced to close their businesses if the situation continued.

The Taliban has not commented on reports of women being detained in Helmand.

The commission recently declared Omid-e Sabz township in western Kabul to be state-owned and ordered residents to leave their homes.

Residents have submitted complaints to Taliban Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani, Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, Defence Minister Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid, intelligence chief Abdul Haq Wasiq and deputy intelligence chief Tajmir Jawad.

However, the order for the forced eviction of Omid-e Sabz residents has not been withdrawn.

Residents also intend to seek a meeting with Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada to raise their complaints.

Akhundzada, who has not appeared publicly, has not met representatives of Afghanistan’s Shia and Hazara communities during the Taliban’s five years in power.

Sources said the Taliban’s land recovery commission planned to review Jebrael township in Herat, as well as extensive properties in Kabul, Mazar-e-Sharif, Bamiyan, Ghazni and several other cities, and potentially declare them state-owned.

Further details of the plan are not available.

A community elder from western Kabul told Afghanistan International: “The Hazaras do not want conflict with the Taliban, but the Justice Ministry is making provocative decisions that leave them no option except to take to the mountains.”

Sources previously told Afghanistan International that the Taliban’s Justice Ministry had given residents of Omid-e Sabz township until Thursday, 6 August, to evacuate their homes.

The order was announced on Sunday during a meeting with neighbourhood representatives and property agents from the township.

According to a notice obtained by Afghanistan International, residents were also told that from Sunday, 2 August, no one would be allowed to rent out a house or collect rent from tenants.

A Taliban special court ruled in early May that more than 741 acres of land in Omid-e Sabz township belonged to the state.

In a statement issued on 26 April, the Taliban’s Justice Ministry said the special court handling cases involving allegedly seized state land in the central zone had examined documents and declared approximately 745 acres of the township to be state property.

The court ruled that all the land belongs to the emirate.

After returning to power, the Taliban established a commission to prevent land seizures and recover allegedly usurped land.

However, reports indicate that the group has confiscated thousands of acers of privately held land in different regions by designating it as “state-owned”.

In late 2025, a Taliban special court also classified and confiscated approximately 911 acres of land in Nawabad township in Ghazni as state property.

An Afghanistan International report at the time said the Taliban had provided no transparency about the review process and that affected landowners were not permitted to appeal within the administration or publicise their documents.

Seyed Hassan Mortazavi, Iran’s deputy ambassador in Kabul, had earlier said Tehran did not support any political or military group opposing the Taliban and did not regard armed conflict against the group as resistance.

Referring to Mortazavi’s position on Monday, Mujahid said the Iranian embassy adopted a very clear position and demonstrated that Iran’s stance is the stance of the Afghan people.

The Taliban spokesman described the remarks as commendable.

He added that no one supported war in Afghanistan and that any person or group that creates disorder under different names and fuels insecurity is condemned.

Mujahid also said Iran understood the importance of regional security and stability and claimed that the Taliban had succeeded in ensuring security in Afghanistan.

Controversial remarks by Iran’s deputy ambassador

The Taliban spokesman’s response followed unprecedented remarks by Seyed Hassan Mortazavi, Iran’s deputy ambassador in Kabul.

At a meeting in Kabul, Mortazavi said Tehran supported no political or military group opposing the Taliban and did not consider their armed struggle against the group to be resistance.

He said Iran regarded developments in Gaza and Lebanon, as well as confrontation with the United States, as resistance.

He described the armed struggle of Taliban opponents as resistance against a Muslim brother and said it did not conform to the Islamic Republic’s definition of resistance.

Iran’s deputy ambassador also said an Islamic government had been established in Afghanistan and that Taliban opponents should resolve their differences through dialogue with the group and reach an accommodation.

The senior Iranian diplomat’s remarks came amid a recent rise in attacks and military activity by anti-Taliban fronts in several provinces, particularly Badakhshan.

Mortazavi, who has been identified as a member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, publicly outlined Tehran’s position on groups opposing the Taliban for the first time.

His comments prompted mixed reactions, with several anti-Taliban movements and groups criticising them.

Habibullah Hassam, head of the National Resistance Front’s council of religious scholars, strongly criticised Mortazavi’s remarks, saying the Iranian diplomat was not in a position to issue religious rulings or determine boundaries between the National Resistance Front and what he called a proxy un-Islamic group.

Mujahid made the remarks in the second episode of the programme Government in the Mirror of the Press. He said the mining sector had previously faced problems including disorder, the seizure of mines and illegal extraction.

According to him, operations at some mines will remain suspended until new guidelines are finalised.

The Taliban halted mining activities in Badakhshan following increased unrest in the province. The Taliban leader had earlier ordered an end to what the group described as illegal mining.

The order directly threatened the economic interests of some local Taliban commanders and fuelled internal tensions. Control over mines has become a major source of disagreement between local Taliban figures in Badakhshan and the group’s leadership.

The ban on illegal mining led to weeks of tension between Juma Khan Fateh, a local Taliban commander who has been at odds with the group’s leadership, and senior Taliban officials. The dispute reportedly reached the point where both sides prepared for a possible armed confrontation.

Meanwhile, some mine workers in Badakhshan previously protested against the continued closure of mining sites by the Taliban.

The protesters said workshops belonging to low-income residents had remained closed for about a month, while operations linked to powerful individuals were continuing.

Mujahid said the Taliban’s Ministry of Mines and Petroleum would announce the new guidelines once they were finalised, and that mining would resume under revised laws and standards.

He also claimed that the Taliban had prevented unauthorised extraction and substandard excavation and had ended uncontrolled mining.

According to him, the measures were intended to protect mineral resources and ensure extraction was carried out in accordance with established standards.

Since returning to power, the Taliban has signed numerous mining contracts with domestic and foreign companies.

However, the management of mineral resources, efforts to prevent illegal extraction and the transparency of mining contracts remain widely debated issues in Afghanistan’s mining sector.

Unregulated mining has also drawn criticism from environmental experts.