Sources told Afghanistan International that Taliban Justice Ministry forces closed Al-Zahra Clinic in Kabul’s Dasht-e-Barchi on Sunday, forcing patients and staff out before sealing its doors.
The clinic was closed at midday on Sunday, 27 September, on the orders of the Taliban administration. Taliban forces told clinic officials that the land had been designated as a “state-owned area”.
According to the sources, the clinic provided low-cost services to local residents. After its closure, some people continued to arrive seeking treatment but found the gates shut.
Al-Zahra Clinic is located near Madrasa Station in Kabul’s Dasht-e-Barchi area and was established by an Iranian charity organisation.
The clinic was built inside the larger Khatam al-Nabieen complex, which the Taliban had previously closed.
Local residents said the Khatam al-Nabieen football stadium, Maiwand Sports Club, Afkar Private School and other facilities within the complex had also been shut.
In 2025, the Taliban Public Health Ministry listed Al-Zahra Clinic among private health facilities being monitored as part of an inspection process in Kabul.
On 21 September, Taliban Justice Ministry forces also surrounded and closed the Khatam al-Nabieen cultural and religious complex and the Mazari Mosalla in Dasht-e-Barchi.
Sources said at the time that the Taliban claimed the land belonged to the state and had to be vacated.
Pakistan’s Express Tribune has reported that relations between Islamabad and the Taliban have reached a stage where a diplomatic reset is becoming increasingly difficult.
A senior Pakistani official involved in Afghanistan policy told the newspaper that relations between the two neighbours were likely to become even more strained.
“We have, I think, reached a point of no return,” the official said.
The report, written by journalist Kamran Yousaf, said that despite recent efforts by Türkiye and Qatar to reduce tensions between Islamabad and Kabul, Pakistani officials believe the relationship could deteriorate further.
“We know the Taliban so well. They are not going to mend their ways,” the unnamed Pakistani official told the Express Tribune.
The official added that the Taliban’s measures to address Pakistan’s security concerns “are not enough and are cosmetic in nature.”
According to the report, the head of Türkiye’s intelligence service travelled to Kabul and Islamabad as part of regional efforts to ease tensions. However, the diplomatic initiative collapsed before it could gain traction.
The newspaper reported that a day after Turkish and Qatari officials held meetings in Kabul, a deadly attack targeted the police lines in Kohat, with one of the suicide attackers identified as an Afghan national.
Pakistani officials cited the attack as evidence of the continued presence of terrorist groups on Afghan territory, and Pakistan subsequently carried out strikes inside Afghanistan.
The Express Tribune reported that the Taliban responded by sending rudimentary drones towards Pakistan, which Pakistani officials said were neutralised before causing casualties or significant damage.
Pakistan then launched further strikes against drone storage facilities and launch sites at around 10 locations in Afghanistan, including one target in Kandahar.
The report also said the Turkish delegation had expected to meet Taliban leader Haibatullah Akhundzada in Kandahar, but that he instead deputed a member of his staff to meet the delegation. The move was not well received by the Turkish side.
The report further noted that some Pakistani officials believe the growing rift could change perceptions among anti-Taliban groups. For years, some of these groups had viewed Pakistan as still somehow aligned with the Taliban. As tensions deepen, that perception may shift.
“If the Taliban regime’s writ is challenged further, it won’t be a surprise,” the official said.
The Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF) said its forces killed 37 Taliban fighters and wounded 24 others in clashes in Kamdesh district of Nuristan and Nari district of Kunar.
The group dismissed Taliban reports of arrests and casualties among opposition fighters as fabricated and alleged that the Taliban had forced tourists in Nuristan to appear in confession videos as detainees.
In a statement issued on Sunday, 27 September, the Afghanistan Freedom Front said its forces had launched attacks on Taliban positions in Kamdesh and Nari from Saturday morning and that fighting was continuing.
The group said its forces had so far liberated several villages in the two districts from Taliban control.
According to the statement, AFF forces launched a coordinated counter-attack, cleared several checkpoints of Taliban fighters and seized what it described as a large quantity of light and heavy weapons.
The group claimed the Taliban had been pushed back after suffering heavy casualties.
It also alleged that, to justify its defeat on the battlefield and divert public attention, the Taliban had released confession videos of domestic travellers and tourists in the area, presenting them as members of the Freedom Front.
The Taliban Defence Ministry had earlier confirmed fighting in the two districts. In a statement, it said 28 opposition fighters had been killed and 32 others detained in Kamdesh district of Nuristan.
Taliban-affiliated social media users also published videos showing several people making confessions and described them as opposition fighters. It is unclear under what circumstances the statements were obtained.
The Afghanistan Freedom Front said the bodies and wounded Taliban fighters had been taken to hospitals in Kunar and Nuristan.
The Front said that its commandos have maintained their positions and defensive lines in the villages and areas they have taken in Kamdesh and Nari, while temporarily withdrawing from some vulnerable checkpoints.
The group said its commandos in the eastern region are mainly local young people with detailed knowledge of the operational areas and a strong understanding of the terrain.
The political and military opposition group said its forces remained committed to fighting for the country’s freedom, protecting human dignity, the values of the people of Afghanistan and respecting international laws of war.
AFF also claimed that Taliban “propaganda” about the fighting in Kamdesh and Nari reflected the group’s confusion and weakness.
Referring to the confession videos released by the Taliban, the group said the move demonstrated what it described as the Taliban’s ignorance and disrespect for human values and its failure to observe international humanitarian principles and laws.
The UK government is set to reopen a refugee resettlement scheme that will prioritise vulnerable Afghan women and girls, Palestinian refugees and people with disabilities.
The Guardian reported on Sunday that Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is expected to announce the reopening of the UK Resettlement Scheme at the Labour Party conference on Monday. The scheme had effectively been suspended for two years, although it was never formally closed.
Under the reopened scheme, refugees arriving through the legal route will have a more favourable path to permanent settlement than those who enter the UK through irregular routes, including small-boat crossings.
The Guardian reported that the Home Office expects Afghan women and girls and Palestinian refugees to account for about a quarter of arrivals during the initial phase. Numbers are expected to be limited at first, with an annual cap on admissions.
Home Office sources told the newspaper that the programme was likely to begin with hundreds of refugees and could expand to the low thousands in subsequent years if levels of irregular migration decline.
Eligible refugees will be identified by the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP). They will undergo security and criminal-record checks before entering the UK.
Vulnerable women and girls, people with disabilities and others in urgent need of protection will be prioritised. Family units will be allowed to resettle together under the scheme, although the provision will not extend to wider family members.
Mahmood is expected to present the scheme as part of the government’s effort to balance tighter immigration controls with its commitment to protecting the most vulnerable refugees.
Reaction And Criticism
Migration experts and refugee organisations have welcomed the reopening of a safe and legal route but warned that the number of people admitted is likely to be too small to have a significant effect on the number of asylum seekers crossing the English Channel.
Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said the scheme was primarily based on the principle that Britain should play its part in protecting the world’s most vulnerable refugees.
She said, however, that there was no reason to believe resettlement alone would substantially reduce irregular arrivals.
Jon Featonby, chief policy analyst at the Refugee Council, also welcomed the creation of safe and legal routes but said such programmes could undermine the business model of people smugglers only if they operated at sufficient scale.
The scheme is also likely to face criticism from right-wing parties, including Reform UK, particularly over welfare costs and security screening.
Former Afghan MP Fawzia Koofi welcomed the UK’s plans.
Koofi said that after four years of advocacy, campaigning and correspondence, calls to protect Afghan women at risk were finally receiving a response.
She expressed hope that the Home Office would establish a mechanism allowing women at particular risk, especially those who have resisted Taliban restrictions and repression, to benefit from the scheme.
Former Afghan vice-president Amrullah Saleh says Afghanistan has entered a civil war, warning that the conflict remains limited for now but could develop into a more violent and destructive confrontation.
In an interview with Outlook, Saleh described Taliban rule as “illegitimate” and said public opposition to the group was taking various forms, with armed attacks being its most visible expression.
According to Saleh, Afghanistan under Taliban rule lacks national sovereignty and a legitimate state system, a situation he said has had serious consequences across the country, particularly in the north, Kabul and other major cities.
Saleh described the challenge posed by anti-Taliban forces as “real” but said their attacks had so far not been sufficiently widespread, intense or “loud”. He added that dictatorships usually underestimate their opponents, public anger and opposition forces.
The former official rejected reports of a serious rift between the Afghan Taliban and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, saying he had not observed growing differences between the two sides.
Saleh argued that the Afghan Taliban were “indebted” to the Pakistani Taliban and that what might appear to be mutual cooperation was driven more by necessity than favour.
He also claimed that the Taliban had maintained relations with anti-government groups in the region and that some global powers supported these ties.
Saleh called for the secret annexes of the Doha Agreement to be made public, saying: “If the secret annexes to the Doha deal are made public. We can decode the Taliban's conduct more easily. Afghanistan was handed over to them for a purpose.”
Referring to the nature of the Taliban, he said: “A scorpion without venom is not a scorpion.”
Saleh rejected assessments suggesting that the Taliban had “changed” or “reformed”, saying the group had only one “DNA”, which he described as “anti-national, anti-civilisation, anti- inclusivity, misogynistic”.
In his view, the Taliban see themselves as tasked with forcing others into submission through torture.
Speaking about reported differences between the Taliban leadership in Kandahar and Kabul, Saleh said what Afghans were experiencing was cruelty, exclusion and repression.
Saleh also said it was no longer possible to speak of a single policy pursued by an international community, because major powers and neighbouring countries now have different policies towards Afghanistan.
Pakistani security sources told Afghanistan International that the Tehreek Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has established military training centres in Kunar, Nangarhar, Khost and Paktika. They said some Afghan Taliban fighters have joined the centres and the TTP’s ranks.
According to Pakistani security sources, the presence of Afghan Taliban fighters at TTP training centres indicates an overlap between Taliban structures and the Pakistani Taliban’s infrastructure.
The sources added that whenever TTP hideouts and facilities are targeted, the Taliban defend the group’s members and shelters rather than dismantling them.
Pakistani security sources also said that armed group activity in Afghanistan is not limited to the TTP, claiming that al-Qaeda, the East Turkestan Islamic Movement and ISIS are also present in parts of the country.
Previous United Nations reports have also documented the continued presence and activities of these groups in Afghanistan.
In recent months, Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Taliban of providing safe havens for the TTP and allowing the group to carry out attacks against Pakistan. The Taliban has denied the allegations, saying it does not allow Afghan territory to be used against other countries.
Widespread Afghan Presence in TTP Ranks
Pakistani security sources said more than 70% of TTP fighters entering Pakistan from Afghanistan are Afghan nationals.
According to the sources, the Taliban has also supplied TTP fighters with weapons and equipment left behind by US and NATO forces. They cited M4 rifles, Remington sniper rifles and night-vision equipment as examples.
According to information provided by Pakistani sources, the identities of 260 Afghan nationals killed in attacks and what the sources described as “terrorist activities in Pakistan” have been established, including their names, addresses and family details.
Pakistani sources said the figure does not include unidentified individuals or active fighters, adding that some of those killed were buried in their home areas in Afghanistan.
The sources also claimed that terrorist activities originating from Afghan territory have killed 1,327 Pakistanis and wounded another 2,484 so far in 2026.
In response to an increase in armed attacks in Pakistan, Islamabad has carried out airstrikes on several Taliban bases and military facilities in three Afghan provinces in recent days.
Pakistan said its strikes on September 21 targeted militant positions in Kunar and Paktika, killing 28 people, while the Taliban and the United Nations reported that three civilians had been killed in Kunar.
On September 24, Pakistan also announced that it had targeted 10 sites in Afghanistan associated with the storage and launch of drones. The Taliban said at least four civilians had been killed in recent Pakistani strikes across three provinces.
The Taliban described the strikes as a violation of Afghanistan’s sovereignty and said it had carried out attacks on Pakistani border positions in response.
