• العربية
  • پښتو
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Afghanistan
  • Sport
  • Analysis
  • Markets
  • Afghanistan
  • Sport
  • Analysis
  • Markets
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • پښتو
    • فارسی
  • Afghanistan
  • Sport
  • Analysis
  • Markets
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Pashtuns Hold Power While Other Ethnic Groups Are Excluded, Says Islamabad Conference

Sep 30, 2026, 14:15 GMT+1

The Islamabad International Conference on Afghanistan said Pashtuns, who make up 42% of the population, hold power, while the remaining 58%, including Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks and Turkmens, are excluded.

The statement said the Taliban administration was neither inclusive nor legitimate, adding that excluding a large part of society from power created conditions for structural instability.

The international conference, titled Afghan Predicament and the Trajectory to Peace, was held in Islamabad on 29 and 30 September.

Maria Sultan, president of the South Asian Strategic Stability Institute, presented the conference’s final statement.

The statement said Afghanistan was facing a dual crisis of a non-inclusive and unrepresentative government, while also alleging that the Taliban administration provided safe havens for terrorist groups.

The Islamabad conference said Afghanistan was now facing three fundamental challenges concerning legitimacy, capacity and inclusion.

It said excluding different groups from government created structural instability. The statement added that cohesion within the Taliban regime did not amount to national cohesion and argued that the Taliban system was illegitimate not merely because it lacked recognition, but because of its structure.

The Taliban has described its government as inclusive, saying people from different ethnic groups are represented within its institutions. Critics, however, say the presence of individuals from different ethnic backgrounds does not necessarily amount to political participation by ethnic and social groups in major decision-making.

Current Government Does Not Represent Afghans

In the section titled the Islamabad Declaration 2026, participants said the current Taliban government did not represent the people of Afghanistan.

The document said that control does not mean legitimacy; the absence of war does not mean peace; and regime cohesion does not mean national cohesion.

The declaration also said genuine change was not possible within the Taliban’s current framework and argued that a government excluding women and minorities could not guarantee stability, development or respect for human rights.

Participants called for power to be returned to the Afghan people through the establishment of an inclusive, balanced and modern government.

Warning Over Girls’ Education And Expansion Of Religious Schools

Another section of the statement focused on Taliban restrictions on women and girls.

The document said depriving women and girls of education, employment and parts of public life was among the factors weakening Afghanistan’s capacity.

It also warned about the expansion of religious schools, saying their number had risen to around 22,000 over the past five years, compared with about 18,000 regular schools.

Participants said Afghanistan’s education system should provide religious education alongside science, technology, vocational training and critical thinking.

The declaration described the exclusion of women, who make up roughly half of Afghanistan’s population, as strategic suicide, saying that without women’s participation and an inclusive political system, the younger generation could not be protected from poverty, extremism and violence.

Concern Over Presence Of Armed Groups

The Islamabad conference also warned about the presence and activities of armed groups in Afghanistan.

The statement said more than 20 groups had safe havens in Afghanistan and that their continued activities could have security consequences for Pakistan, Iran, Central Asia, Russia, China and other countries.

The Taliban has denied the presence of terrorist groups in Afghanistan and has repeatedly said it will not allow Afghan territory to be used against other countries.

The declaration called for the establishment of a joint monitoring mechanism involving the United Nations, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation to assess commitments related to preventing safe havens, recruitment and financing for armed groups.

Criticism Of International Community

Participants at the Islamabad conference also criticised the international community’s approach towards Afghanistan.

The statement said there was a contradiction between the principles set out in the charters of the United Nations, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the “tolerance” of Afghanistan’s current situation.

It said engagement with the Taliban without clear benchmarks had failed and argued that any future engagement should be linked to criteria concerning women’s education and employment, political participation, citizens’ rights and efforts against armed groups.

The declaration also called for greater transparency in international aid, saying assistance should reach families directly, particularly women and children.

The Islamabad Declaration 2026 concluded that Afghanistan’s crisis was not solely a matter concerning the government in Kabul but was also linked to what it described as unfulfilled responsibilities of the region and the international community.

Participants warned that ignoring what they called Afghanistan’s non-Taliban majority could become a strategic failure, with security and humanitarian consequences extending beyond Afghanistan’s borders.

Using the phrase Kabul governs, Kandahar commands, the statement said key decision-making within the Taliban structure was concentrated under the group’s leader in Kandahar.

In the statement it is said that forty-two per cent, the Pashtuns, govern, while 58 per cent, including Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks and Turkmens, are excluded.

Most Viewed

Anti-Taliban Front Publishes Images Of 10 Taliban Fighters Killed In Nuristan
1

Anti-Taliban Front Publishes Images Of 10 Taliban Fighters Killed In Nuristan

2

Pakistan Helped Armed Fighters Enter Nuristan, Says Taliban

3

United Front Takes Responsibility For Ghor Governor’s Office Attack

4

Taliban Should Move Away From ‘Militant Mindset’, Says Pakistani Minister

5

Fighting Resumes Between AFF & Taliban In Nuristan, Say Sources

•
•
•

More Stories

Do Not Test Afghans’ Patience, Taliban Minister Warns Pakistan

Sep 30, 2026, 13:22 GMT+1
100%

Noorullah Noori, the Taliban’s Borders, Tribes and Tribal Affairs Minister, warned Pakistan and the group’s armed opponents, saying Islamabad should learn from Afghanistan’s history and that Taliban opponents would be “defeated” if they chose war.

Speaking on Wednesday at a meeting with Kuchi elders from six provinces, Noori said those seeking to destabilise Afghanistan would face “serious consequences”.

Relations between the Taliban and Pakistan are highly strained, with both sides accusing each other of supporting armed opponents.

Taliban and Pakistani forces have repeatedly clashed along the border, and last week Pakistan carried out air strikes on targets in several Afghan provinces.

Referring to the tensions, Noori said: “Pakistan’s army and intelligence services should understand the people of Afghanistan from a historical, ideological, political and practical perspective.”

He added that many books had been written about Afghanistan and said Pakistan should learn from the fate of powers that had fought in the country.

The Taliban minister claimed that both the Soviet Union and the United States had been defeated in Afghanistan, saying: “The Americans will write in their history that they were defeated in Afghanistan.”

Addressing Pakistani officials, he added: “Study history, the Afghans and their politics. You should not test the patience and endurance of Afghans.”

In another part of his remarks, the Taliban minister criticised the group’s political and military opponents, including the National Resistance Front and other armed groups.

Referring to nearly five years of Taliban rule, he said: “From whom are you liberating Afghanistan? You are in other countries and say you are resisting to free Afghanistan. From whom do you want to gain freedom?”

Taliban opponents, including the Afghanistan Freedom Front, National Resistance Front and United Front of Afghanistan, have stepped up attacks against the Taliban in recent months.

Noori said Taliban opponents had stood alongside what he called “occupiers” during the presence of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, but now spoke of fighting for freedom.

He claimed that Afghanistan was now ruled by a “government of religious scholars, martyrs, the people and victims”, adding: “This regime is Islamic, Sharia-based and Afghan.”

The Taliban minister also asked what system the opposition wanted to replace the current administration with, saying the Afghan people were Muslims and that armed resistance against Taliban rule had “no basis in Sharia”.

Noori urged opponents to abandon armed struggle and return to Afghanistan. “Afghanistan is the home of all Afghans. We believe in understanding and we will talk with you,” he said.

He added: “Return to your country and live peacefully. But if you come with guns, you will be defeated.”

Taliban opponents have repeatedly challenged the legitimacy of the group’s administration, saying the Taliban seized power by force, established an ethnically and gender-exclusive government, excluded women from public life and marginalised ethnic communities.

Taliban Should Move Away From ‘Militant Mindset’, Says Pakistani Minister

Sep 29, 2026, 17:55 GMT+1
100%

Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar urged the Afghan Taliban to move away from what he called a militant mindset and adopt the approach of a responsible government, saying their policies were driving tensions with Pakistan.

Speaking at a conference on Afghanistan in Islamabad, Tarar said Pakistan had repeatedly tried to resolve its differences with Kabul through dialogue, but continued insecurity and the activities of armed groups remained the biggest obstacles in relations between the two countries.

The conference, held in Islamabad on Tuesday, focused on the situation in Afghanistan and prospects for peace in the region.

Tarar said Pakistan and Afghanistan were neighbouring countries with deep historical, geographical and cultural ties and would inevitably have to live alongside one another.

He said Islamabad had consistently supported peace, dialogue and peaceful coexistence, but questioned whether there was sufficient willingness on the Afghan side to achieve peace.

The Pakistani information minister said his government had made several attempts in recent years to resolve problems with the Taliban. According to him, Pakistani delegations had travelled to Afghanistan several times, while talks had also been held in third countries, including Istanbul and Doha.

Tarar repeated Islamabad’s allegations against the Taliban, saying terrorist safe havens and the presence of armed groups on Afghan soil were among the main obstacles to peace between the two countries. He claimed that banned organisations continued to operate in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Taliban in recent years of failing to prevent armed groups opposed to Islamabad from operating from Afghan territory. Taliban officials have rejected the allegations and say they do not allow Afghan soil to be used against any country.

Tarar also said peace and stability in Afghanistan could create significant economic and trade opportunities for the region.

He added that Afghanistan had the potential to become a bridge between Central Asia and Pakistan, allowing Central Asian countries to gain access through Pakistan to its ports and warm-water routes.

Ties With Taliban At ‘Point Of No Return’, Says Pakistani Official

Sep 28, 2026, 12:14 GMT+1
100%

Pakistan’s Express Tribune has reported that relations between Islamabad and the Taliban have reached a stage where a diplomatic reset is becoming increasingly difficult.

A senior Pakistani official involved in Afghanistan policy told the newspaper that relations between the two neighbours were likely to become even more strained.

“We have, I think, reached a point of no return,” the official said.

The report, written by journalist Kamran Yousaf, said that despite recent efforts by Türkiye and Qatar to reduce tensions between Islamabad and Kabul, Pakistani officials believe the relationship could deteriorate further.

“We know the Taliban so well. They are not going to mend their ways,” the unnamed Pakistani official told the Express Tribune.

The official added that the Taliban’s measures to address Pakistan’s security concerns “are not enough and are cosmetic in nature.”

According to the report, the head of Türkiye’s intelligence service travelled to Kabul and Islamabad as part of regional efforts to ease tensions. However, the diplomatic initiative collapsed before it could gain traction.

The newspaper reported that a day after Turkish and Qatari officials held meetings in Kabul, a deadly attack targeted the police lines in Kohat, with one of the suicide attackers identified as an Afghan national.

Pakistani officials cited the attack as evidence of the continued presence of terrorist groups on Afghan territory, and Pakistan subsequently carried out strikes inside Afghanistan.

The Express Tribune reported that the Taliban responded by sending rudimentary drones towards Pakistan, which Pakistani officials said were neutralised before causing casualties or significant damage.

Pakistan then launched further strikes against drone storage facilities and launch sites at around 10 locations in Afghanistan, including one target in Kandahar.

The report also said the Turkish delegation had expected to meet Taliban leader Haibatullah Akhundzada in Kandahar, but that he instead deputed a member of his staff to meet the delegation. The move was not well received by the Turkish side.

The report further noted that some Pakistani officials believe the growing rift could change perceptions among anti-Taliban groups. For years, some of these groups had viewed Pakistan as still somehow aligned with the Taliban. As tensions deepen, that perception may shift.

“If the Taliban regime’s writ is challenged further, it won’t be a surprise,” the official said.

37 Taliban Fighters Killed In Nuristan & Kunar, Says Afghanistan Freedom Front

Sep 28, 2026, 11:00 GMT+1
100%

The Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF) said its forces killed 37 Taliban fighters and wounded 24 others in clashes in Kamdesh district of Nuristan and Nari district of Kunar.

The group dismissed Taliban reports of arrests and casualties among opposition fighters as fabricated and alleged that the Taliban had forced tourists in Nuristan to appear in confession videos as detainees.

In a statement issued on Sunday, 27 September, the Afghanistan Freedom Front said its forces had launched attacks on Taliban positions in Kamdesh and Nari from Saturday morning and that fighting was continuing.

The group said its forces had so far liberated several villages in the two districts from Taliban control.

According to the statement, AFF forces launched a coordinated counter-attack, cleared several checkpoints of Taliban fighters and seized what it described as a large quantity of light and heavy weapons.

The group claimed the Taliban had been pushed back after suffering heavy casualties.

It also alleged that, to justify its defeat on the battlefield and divert public attention, the Taliban had released confession videos of domestic travellers and tourists in the area, presenting them as members of the Freedom Front.

The Taliban Defence Ministry had earlier confirmed fighting in the two districts. In a statement, it said 28 opposition fighters had been killed and 32 others detained in Kamdesh district of Nuristan.

Taliban-affiliated social media users also published videos showing several people making confessions and described them as opposition fighters. It is unclear under what circumstances the statements were obtained.

The Afghanistan Freedom Front said the bodies and wounded Taliban fighters had been taken to hospitals in Kunar and Nuristan.

The Front said that its commandos have maintained their positions and defensive lines in the villages and areas they have taken in Kamdesh and Nari, while temporarily withdrawing from some vulnerable checkpoints.

The group said its commandos in the eastern region are mainly local young people with detailed knowledge of the operational areas and a strong understanding of the terrain.

The political and military opposition group said its forces remained committed to fighting for the country’s freedom, protecting human dignity, the values of the people of Afghanistan and respecting international laws of war.

AFF also claimed that Taliban “propaganda” about the fighting in Kamdesh and Nari reflected the group’s confusion and weakness.

Referring to the confession videos released by the Taliban, the group said the move demonstrated what it described as the Taliban’s ignorance and disrespect for human values and its failure to observe international humanitarian principles and laws.

UK To Reopen Refugee Scheme Prioritising Afghan Women, Palestinians

Sep 28, 2026, 08:34 GMT+1
100%

The UK government is set to reopen a refugee resettlement scheme that will prioritise vulnerable Afghan women and girls, Palestinian refugees and people with disabilities.

The Guardian reported on Sunday that Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is expected to announce the reopening of the UK Resettlement Scheme at the Labour Party conference on Monday. The scheme had effectively been suspended for two years, although it was never formally closed.

Under the reopened scheme, refugees arriving through the legal route will have a more favourable path to permanent settlement than those who enter the UK through irregular routes, including small-boat crossings.

The Guardian reported that the Home Office expects Afghan women and girls and Palestinian refugees to account for about a quarter of arrivals during the initial phase. Numbers are expected to be limited at first, with an annual cap on admissions.

Home Office sources told the newspaper that the programme was likely to begin with hundreds of refugees and could expand to the low thousands in subsequent years if levels of irregular migration decline.

Eligible refugees will be identified by the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP). They will undergo security and criminal-record checks before entering the UK.

Vulnerable women and girls, people with disabilities and others in urgent need of protection will be prioritised. Family units will be allowed to resettle together under the scheme, although the provision will not extend to wider family members.

Mahmood is expected to present the scheme as part of the government’s effort to balance tighter immigration controls with its commitment to protecting the most vulnerable refugees.

Reaction And Criticism

Migration experts and refugee organisations have welcomed the reopening of a safe and legal route but warned that the number of people admitted is likely to be too small to have a significant effect on the number of asylum seekers crossing the English Channel.

Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said the scheme was primarily based on the principle that Britain should play its part in protecting the world’s most vulnerable refugees.

She said, however, that there was no reason to believe resettlement alone would substantially reduce irregular arrivals.

Jon Featonby, chief policy analyst at the Refugee Council, also welcomed the creation of safe and legal routes but said such programmes could undermine the business model of people smugglers only if they operated at sufficient scale.

The scheme is also likely to face criticism from right-wing parties, including Reform UK, particularly over welfare costs and security screening.

Former Afghan MP Fawzia Koofi welcomed the UK’s plans.

Koofi said that after four years of advocacy, campaigning and correspondence, calls to protect Afghan women at risk were finally receiving a response.

She expressed hope that the Home Office would establish a mechanism allowing women at particular risk, especially those who have resisted Taliban restrictions and repression, to benefit from the scheme.